The Board has decided that a new VA examination is needed to determine if the Veteran's lung condition was incurred in service due to asbestos exposure.
The deciding factor: The previous medical opinion did not consider all relevant evidence, including recent CT scans and a 1999 letter from a doctor who speculated about asbestos exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- lung condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 12, 2019
- Citation
- 19145401
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection for various conditions due to untimely filing of the December 2024 VA Form 10182.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for various conditions and a higher disability rating for PTSD, as the evidence did not support the presence of current disabilities or a nexus to service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a lung condition, finding that the evidence does not support a nexus between the Veteran's lung condition and his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for various conditions as a pre-decisional duty to assist error was found, specifically regarding notice and examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.