The Veteran's claim for TDIU was granted, with an effective date of July 11, 2012. The Board found that the Veteran initiated his claim during a period of marginal employment and thus eligibility for schedular TDIU began on the date VA received the claim.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's employment at Southern Hardware was marginal between March 14, 2012, and March 14, 2013, with gross earnings not exceeding the poverty threshold for one person. The claim was initiated during this period of marginal employment, making it the first indication in the claims file of unemployability due to service-connected disability.
- Claimed conditions
- unspecified
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19147013
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,017 · Granted: 36% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19147013.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on unemployability due to service-connected disabilities was denied as she is not service connected for any disabilities.
- Granted
The Veteran's TDIU rating is granted from February 1, 2010, as this was the date he stopped working due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Granted
The Board has reinstated the Veteran's entitlement to a Total Disability Rating Based on Individual Unemployability (TDIU) due to disagreement over the weight of evidence indicating that his service-connected disabilities do render him unable to maintain gainful employment.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to an error in failing to obtain a VA opinion regarding the functional impact of any side effects from medication used to treat service-connected disabilities, which may affect the Veteran's ability to work.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.