The Veteran's non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is granted as service connected due to in-service herbicide exposure at U-Tapao RTAFB.
The deciding factor: The Veteran served near the air base perimeter of U-Tapao RTAFB and was exposed to herbicides, allowing for presumptive service connection for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
- Claimed conditions
- non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19147450
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,454 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19147450.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to issues related to service connection for various symptoms, including dementia, vertigo, migraine headaches, and bodily pain. The Veteran's non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma residuals are also being evaluated.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy with foot drop, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma due to in-service herbicide agent exposure. The Court found that the Board did not address the Veteran’s lay contentions regarding herbicide agent exposure and formaldehyde exposure during autopsies.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal because the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional development and readjudication, including obtaining a VA medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.