The Board remands the claims for service connection for an esophageal condition and a bilateral leg disability due to insufficient evidence, requiring new VA examinations.
The deciding factor: Remand is necessary because of unclear scheduling and potential lack of notice to the Veteran regarding scheduled examinations, as well as his inability to attend due to recent brain surgery.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral leg disability, to include bilateral stress fractures, esophageal condition
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- Camp Lejeune water
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 10, 2025
- Citation
- 25007711
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,135 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 25007711.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for service connection on the issues of esophageal condition, right foot condition, headaches, seizure disorder, traumatic brain injury, and hypertension have been dismissed due to withdrawal by the Veteran during a Board hearing. The claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to a duty to assist error, and will need additional medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's esophageal condition is related to his active service.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeals for the issues of entitlement to service connection for anxiety condition and esophageal condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the Veteran's esophageal condition, including whether it is related to toxic exposure during his Gulf War service and any service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.