The Board remands the claim for service connection for angina to correct a duty to assist error, specifically to obtain private treatment records from the Veteran's cardiologist.
The deciding factor: The decision turns on whether the Veteran has a current disability, and relevant private treatment records have not been obtained.
- Claimed conditions
- angina
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 3, 2025
- Citation
- A25057756
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 926 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A25057756.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's heart disability, claimed as secondary to PTSD, requires further examination and opinion due to a duty to assist error. The case is being remanded for an addendum VA examination.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal regarding the proposed effective date for the evaluation of coronary artery disease, angina, cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, status post CABG, hypertensive heart disease due to it being premature.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a heart condition, including angina, has been granted due to the submission of new and relevant evidence. The claim for an increased rating for unspecified depressive disorder remains denied.,The Board is remanding the case to consider the newly submitted evidence in determining whether it warrants a higher disability rating for the Veteran's unspecified depressive disorder.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been granted. The Board found that the Veteran's lymphoma is related to his active duty service and has awarded service connection for angina secondary to his service-connected asbestosis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.