Allergic rhinitis decisions — 2010
205 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unemployable. The case is being remanded for further examination and review of his claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's allergic rhinitis did not meet or approximate the criteria for a compensable disability rating under VA's rating schedule, and thus denied her claim for an initial compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for allergic rhinitis, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, and tinnitus. The examiner found that the current conditions are not related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings on multiple conditions were dismissed due to his withdrawal of the appeals. The claims for service connection for hypoglycemia and hypercholesterolemia (including hypertension) were denied as there was no evidence showing these conditions were incurred in or aggravated by service, nor could they be presumed to have been incurred therein. The claim for TDIU was also denied as there is no evidence of unemployability solely due to service-connected disabilities prior to May 30, 1997.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including additional VA examinations and a determination of the appropriate rating for his service-connected allergic rhinitis/sinusitis and whether he is entitled to a TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, hearing loss and middle ear cholesteatoma, sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, a genitourinary disorder, and a cardiac disability as secondary to his service-connected hepatitis C.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)March 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to determine if any current respiratory disability is related to service and whether any tinnitus or left ear hearing loss is related to service. The Veteran's claims of service connection are pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD, respiratory problems including sinusitis and/or rhinitis, right elbow disability, body aches and joint pain including low back, hip, neck and bilateral knee pain, sleep impairment, fatigue, night sweats, and memory loss. The claims are based on evidence that was reopened due to new and material information.
- Whole decision: GrantedMarch 2010
The Board has granted service connection for allergic rhinitis with asthma and assigned a 30 percent rating. Service connection for hypertension, chronic fatigue syndrome, PTSD, and residuals of anti-malarial treatment are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU was denied as he did not meet the schedular criteria for a TDIU prior to July 12, 2007. The effective date of his TDIU is set at July 12, 2007.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied as there is no evidence of a current disability, or any link to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for TDIU benefits was denied as there is no evidence of unemployability prior to December 13, 2007. The RO found that the Veteran did not meet the schedular criteria for a TDIU before this date.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him eligible for TDIU from August 30, 2004 to September 9, 2009 under the schedular percentage requirements. However, he was denied TDIU as his disabilities alone did not prevent him from securing and following substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for allergic rhinitis and sinusitis, finding that the evidence does not meet the criteria for a higher rating under the applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including heart condition, blocked nose, skin condition, spinal cord or low back injury, respiratory disorder (claimed due to asbestos exposure), and other conditions. The evidence does not support a finding of service origin for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMarch 2010
The Veteran's service-connected perennial allergic rhinitis/sinusitis is currently rated at 10 percent, and the Board finds no evidence of more than three to six non-incapacitating episodes per year. Therefore, a higher rating is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · March 2010
The Veteran asserts service connection for a low back disability and other conditions. The Board finds that additional verification of his Reserve service is needed.,The Veteran asserts service connection for bilateral hearing loss disability. The Board finds that additional verification of his Reserve service is needed and a new VA examination is necessary to determine the nature and etiology, including aggravation, of any hearing loss demonstrated to have existed either during service or prior to service.,The Veteran asserts service connection for gastrointestinal disability (GERD and hiatal hernia). The Board finds that additional verification of his Reserve service is needed and a new VA examination is necessary to determine the nature and etiology, including aggravation, of any gastrointestinal condition demonstrated to have existed either during service or prior to service.,The Veteran asserts service connection for chronic nasal allergies (sinusitis and/or rhinitis). The Board finds that additional verification of his Reserve service is needed and a new VA examination is necessary to determine the nature and etiology, including aggravation, of any chronic nasal allergy demonstrated to have existed either during service or prior to service.,The Veteran asserts service connection for pulmonary disability (bronchitis). The Board finds that additional verification of his Reserve service is needed and a new VA examination is necessary to determine the nature and etiology, including aggravation, of any bronchitis demonstrated to have existed either during service or prior to service.
- Whole decision: DismissedFebruary 2010
The appeal has been dismissed as the appellant withdrew it prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: GrantedFebruary 2010
- Whole decision: DeniedFebruary 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's headaches, sinusitis, and allergic rhinitis are not related to his service-connected COPD. Therefore, the claims for secondary service connection have been denied.
← Back to Allergic rhinitis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.