Allergic rhinitis Board decisions
12,513 indexed Board decisions for Allergic rhinitis.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for tendonitis of the left hand, generalized arthritis (claimed as arthritis of the entire body and chronic joint pain due to radiation exposure and cold weather exposure), tinnitus, bilateral hearing loss, sinusitis/allergic rhinitis, adjustment disorder with anxiety, depressed mood, insomnia, and side effects from medications. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to service or any specific exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied a rating in excess of 10 percent for allergic rhinitis with the residuals of an ethmoid fracture, finding that prior to March 3, 1999, the veteran had no more than moderate crusting and ozena. As of March 3, 1999, he did not manifest more than mild rhinitis without atrophic changes or polyps.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection for allergic rhinitis, sexual dysfunction, frequent urination, skin rashes, and insomnia and memory loss have been denied. The Board found no evidence of a current disability in any of these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The veteran's service-connected allergic rhinitis is not presumed to have been incurred due to Agent Orange exposure. The veteran was granted a non-compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and a 20% rating for chronic mechanical low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine.
- Whole decision: DismissedJune 2006
The veteran requested the withdrawal of all pending issues before the Board due to his request for a withdrawal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including examinations and opinions regarding her thyroid condition, skin conditions, bilateral eye conditions, headaches, and allergic rhinitis.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has granted a 10 percent rating for allergic rhinitis, effective from the date of the April 2005 VA examination. Service connection for bronchitis and asthma is also granted.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has granted a 30 percent rating for the veteran's chronic sinusitis with headaches and rhinitis, which is the maximum allowable under the applicable criteria.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
Service connection granted for hypertension with an effective date of January 24, 2003.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with cholecystectomy, and allergic rhinitis. The evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected chronic rhinitis with deviated nasal septum and bilateral maxillary sinusitis have been denied. The veteran is currently rated at 30 percent for both conditions, but the Board found that a higher rating was not warranted based on the evidence of record.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has determined that the veteran's allergic rhinitis and sinusitis are directly related to his active military service, with a current diagnosis dating back to 1998. The Board finds that the evidence is in equipoise as to whether these conditions were incurred during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The veteran's low back disorder is found to be service-connected, and he is granted a compensable rating for his left orchiectomy. The residuals of toxic gas exposure are not service-connected.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2006
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for further evaluation and consideration due to his claim of a rating in excess of 10 percent for maxillary sinusitis with allergic rhinitis. The RO will schedule him for a VA examination, obtain any additional evidence pertinent to his claim, and then adjudicate it.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board denied service connection for bipolar disorder, COPD, asthma, and rhinitis. The veteran's current conditions are not related to her military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2006
The Board has determined that a higher initial disability evaluation is not warranted for the veteran's service-connected allergic rhinitis. A separate compensable rating of 10 percent is granted for laryngitis.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected psychogenic post-traumatic headaches and chronic rhinitis, as well as his claim for a total evaluation based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, all claimed as due to Agent Orange exposure during service, were denied because there was no credible evidence of the occurrence of the alleged stressors or diseases.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2006
The Board has reviewed the veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions and finds that there is no competent or probative evidence linking any of these conditions to his military service, including alleged receipt of an anthrax vaccine. As such, the veteran's claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2006
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for cerebral spinal fluid leakage, carpal tunnel syndrome of the right wrist, and allergic rhinitis/chronic sinusitis. The claim for a rating in excess of 10 percent for disc protrusion L5-S1 with scoliosis is also denied.
← Back to Allergic rhinitis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.