Ankle decisions — 2015
1,378 indexed Board decisions in 2015.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2015
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal in writing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including obtaining a VA examination and determining the Veteran's receipt of SSA disability benefits. The special monthly compensation claim will also be remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to the need for a videoconference hearing. The issues of entitlement to initial compensable disability ratings and service connection are not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2015
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings have been granted, with a 10% evaluation assigned for each of the three service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to her failure to report for a scheduled videoconference hearing. Her initial rating claims for thoracolumbar strain and right ankle strain are still pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2015
The Veteran was granted service connection for PTSD, but denied for right ankle disability, prostate disability (due to herbicide exposure), and pulmonary respiratory disability. The prostate disability claim is based on presumed exposure to herbicides during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2015
The Veteran's right ankle disability has been manifested by no more than moderate limitation of motion throughout the appeal period. A rating of 10 percent is assigned for his service-connected right ankle disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2015
The Board found no evidence of a currently diagnosed bilateral ankle disorder, cervical spine degenerative joint disease, or low back degenerative changes that are related to service. The Veteran's claims for these conditions were denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to properly adjudicate the Veteran's claims for service connection for right foot and ankle disabilities. This includes obtaining a complete copy of his service treatment records, scheduling VA examinations, and determining if any new evidence should be considered.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a currently diagnosed disability related to bilateral ankle strain, and his service-connected left forearm, chest, and upper abdomen scars do not warrant an initial compensable rating. The Veteran's request for withdrawal of his appeal on the issue of entitlement to an initial rating greater than 30 percent prior to March 17, 2014, and greater than 60 percent thereafter, for arteriosclerotic heart disease and ischemic heart disease has been granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated VA and private treatment records, as well as a new VA examination to assess the severity of his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2015
The Board finds that the Veteran's left ankle condition was not incurred in service and there is no evidence to show any aggravation during service. Therefore, the claim for service connection for a left ankle disability other than fibromyalgia is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Veteran's case is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and providing an examination to determine the nature and etiology of her right knee disability, as well as evaluating her left knee chondromalacia patella, flat feet, and right ankle instability.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including obtaining VA and private treatment records, scheduling a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his right ankle disability, and providing medical opinions regarding service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2015
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant and his representative prior to any decision being made by the Board.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2015
The Veteran's appeal regarding a higher initial rating for his right ankle disability and residual scar, as well as the issue of service connection for sciatic nerve impingement affecting his right lower extremity (claimed secondary to his back disability), was granted by the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2015
The Veteran's initial ratings for his right ankle disability have been denied. He is currently rated at 20 percent since January 30, 2010.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2015
The Veteran's left ankle disorder is not considered to be caused by VA care, and therefore compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Board has remanded the case for a new VA examination with an industrial/occupational specialist to determine whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unemployable. The TDIU claim will be reconsidered following this development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2015
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination report and failure to comply with previous remand directives. The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right ankle disability, claimed as residuals of a right ankle fracture, is now recharacterized as secondary to her service-connected left ankle disability.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.