Osteoarthritis (degenerative arthritis) Board decisions
43,270 indexed Board decisions for Osteoarthritis (degenerative arthritis).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current right wrist disability did not originate during his period of active military service and is therefore denied. The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for a scar as the residual of a hematoma of the thigh was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a back disability, disabilities of the legs and knees including osteoarthritis, and an acquired psychiatric disability including PTSD due to lack of credible evidence of onset or continuity of symptomatology since service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for left ear hearing loss is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability. The claims for right ear hearing loss, tinnitus, and lumbosacral spine status post surgery are remanded due to the need for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development and compliance with VCAA requirements.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, as multiple VA and private examiners have indicated that he is capable of performing sedentary work.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's lumbar spine degenerative disc disease has been rated at the highest available evaluation of 60 percent, which is more than the requested initial evaluation in excess of 20 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claims for higher initial evaluations for his service-connected right shoulder arthritis, left great toe and knee degenerative arthritis, and bilateral hearing loss were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a finding of more than the current assigned disability ratings.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral minimal osteoarthritis of the hip, finding that the most persuasive medical opinion is adverse to the claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's left knee disability was rated at 10 percent prior to December 2, 2008. He is granted a separate 10 percent evaluation for instability of the left knee. The claims for service connection for left ankle and right hip disorders are denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine, lumbar spine, and right knee have been reopened. However, new evidence does not establish a direct relationship between these conditions and his military service.,The Veteran's left knee condition is not shown to be related to his active duty service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board determined that the Veteran's bilateral knee disorder, including degenerative arthritis, was not incurred in active service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran seeks service connection for knee, hip, and back disabilities. The Board has determined that additional development is needed to clarify the nature of these conditions and their relationship to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for left ear hearing loss and right shoulder acromioclavicular degenerative arthritis with impingement syndrome, finding that his current hearing loss was not related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's claim for a temporary total evaluation under the provisions of 38 C.F.R. § 4.30 for convalescence following left knee surgery on February 10, 2006 is being remanded due to incomplete notice and potential service connection issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the nature and etiology of his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's spinal disease and arthritis of multiple joints did not manifest within one year after service, and there is no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for a TDIU was denied as he does not meet the schedular criteria for a TDIU due to his service-connected disabilities. However, the issue of an increased rating for left knee disability is inextricably intertwined with the TDIU claim and must be resolved before the TDIU can be adjudicated.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Board has determined that the evidence does not clearly and unmistakably establish that the Veteran's low back disability is unrelated to his active service, thus restoring service connection for degenerative joint disease of the lumbar spine. The same reasoning applies to the restoration of service connection for osteoarthritis of the right hip, L5 radiculopathy of the right lower extremity, and L5 radiculopathy of the left lower extremity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including obtaining an opinion regarding the impact of his service-connected left knee disability on employment.
← Back to Osteoarthritis (degenerative arthritis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.