Osteoarthritis (degenerative arthritis) Board decisions
43,270 indexed Board decisions for Osteoarthritis (degenerative arthritis).
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's thoracolumbar strain and left knee disability were granted, with the thoracolumbar strain rated at 20 percent and the left knee disability rated as a combined of 20 percent. The appeals for higher ratings continue.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for osteoarthritis of the lumbosacral spine was granted, and he is currently rated at 20 percent from May 30, 2006. The appeal does not involve any service connection issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's service-connected left knee and ankle disabilities are currently rated at 10 percent each. The Board has determined that the evidence does not support a higher rating for either disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral pes planus and lumbosacral strain with degenerative arthritis were denied by the RO in April 2007. The Veteran has expressed disagreement with these decisions.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his left wrist disabilities and service connection for a right knee disability were granted. The claim for service connection for a lumbar spine disability was not addressed due to the Board's remand.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral degenerative arthritis of the knees and denied his claim for service connection for bilateral hearing loss. The decision also remanded the issue of service connection for bilateral hearing loss.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for frostbite residuals were denied as the evidence did not show a relationship to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for right ear hearing loss and bilateral tinnitus, as well as his requests for increased evaluations for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the right knee and instability of the right knee, were all granted. The Veteran now has a 10 percent evaluation for each condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine is found to be related to his military service and the claim for service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found no evidence of a current back or bilateral knee disability, and thus denied service connection for these conditions.,For the bilateral leg disorder issue, there is no competent medical evidence linking any current disability to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for degenerative disc disease, L4-5, L5-S1 was denied. The claim for service connection for idiopathic thrombocarpin purpura with systemic lupus erythermatosus (claimed as thrombocarpin) was also denied due to lack of evidence linking the condition to service or herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's right foot disability, pes planus with degenerative arthritis, did not warrant an increased evaluation as it was of moderate severity and did not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased evaluations of his right ankle and knee disabilities were denied. The claim to reopen a right wrist disability was granted, but no new evaluation is assigned as the highest schedular rating has already been reached.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied service connection for all claimed conditions, finding no current disability and insufficient evidence to link any of the disabilities to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for internal derangement syndrome of the left knee and osteoarthritis of the left knee have been denied as his conditions do not warrant a higher rating under the applicable VA Rating Schedule.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 20 percent for his service-connected post-operative residuals of a right navicular fracture, finding that there was no evidence to support a higher rating based on impairment of the radius or other diagnostic codes. The preponderance of the evidence did not warrant an increased rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected right knee injury was denied by the Board, as the evidence did not show significant functional loss associated with the knee.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's representative has indicated that the severity of his lumbar strain may have increased since the last VA examination over 4 years ago. The case is being remanded to allow for an updated VA examination and a merits analysis.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied the claim of clear and unmistakable error in the July 14, 1950 rating decision that granted service connection for a right ankle sprain with a noncompensable evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's service-connected osteoarthritis of the right ankle is manifested by ankylosis, and he is currently receiving a 40% rating for this condition. The Board denied his request for an increased rating as the current evaluation adequately compensates for his disability.
← Back to Osteoarthritis (degenerative arthritis) overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.