Asbestosis decisions — 2003
124 indexed Board decisions in 2003.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2003
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for pulmonary asbestosis and carcinoma of the colon, both claimed as secondary to asbestos exposure in service. The evidence did not show a relationship between these conditions and service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2003
The veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a perforated eardrum due to VA treatment was denied, and his claims for increased evaluations of bilateral hearing loss and asbestosis were also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2003
The Board has determined that the initial noncompensable evaluation assigned for service-connected asbestosis is proper, and there is no evidence of symptoms warranting a compensable rating.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2003
The Board dismissed the veteran's appeal for service connection for asbestosis due to his death before a final decision could be made.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board found no evidence of asbestosis related to the veteran's service and denied both his claims for asbestosis disability and kidney disability due to radiation exposure. The veteran's current conditions are not considered service-connected.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The Board found that the veteran does not suffer from sleep apnea or exposure to asbestos related to his service and denied both claims.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2003
The veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2003
The Board found that the veteran's asbestosis is etiologically related to asbestos exposure during his active duty service and granted service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2003
The Board has granted the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for asbestosis and assigned a 30 percent evaluation, effective July 17, 1995. The veteran is seeking an initial evaluation in excess of 30 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to pending issues regarding the veteran's asbestosis disability rating. The case is now remanded for additional evidence and a Pulmonary Function Test.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to pending issues regarding the veteran's asbestosis disability evaluation. The case is now remanded for additional evidence and a special VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The veteran's appeal for service connection for asbestosis is being remanded to the RO for a Travel Board hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The Board has remanded the case for compliance with the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 and further development as needed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of asbestosis is being remanded due to the need to reschedule a travel board hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2003
The Board has ordered further development due to pending issues and is remanding the case back to the RO for additional consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2003
The veteran's appeal was denied as he did not provide the necessary documentation within one year of receiving notification that he could be eligible for additional compensation for his spouse. The effective date cannot be earlier than July 1, 1997, when he became eligible based on his increased rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJune 2003
The Board denied an increased rating for the veteran's pulmonary asbestosis, currently evaluated at 30 percent. The VA medical records showed that the veteran had a Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of not more than 65- to 74-percent predicted or a Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide by the Single Breath Method (DLCO (SB)) of not more than 56- to 65-percent predicted, which does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)June 2003
The veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for service-connected asbestosis is being remanded due to procedural issues and the need to evaluate his condition under both old and new criteria.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2003
The Board has reopened the veteran's claim for service connection for asbestosis and granted it, finding that new medical evidence supports a link between the veteran's current pulmonary disease and his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJune 2003
The Board has determined that new and material evidence was submitted to reopen the veteran's claim for service connection for asbestos exposure. The Board also found that the veteran had a diagnosis of pulmonary asbestosis, which is related to service exposure to asbestos.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.