Asbestosis decisions — 2010
247 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board is remanding the case for further development, including scheduling a video conference hearing with the Veteran.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current asbestosis-related pleural disease with calcified plaques is related to his service, and thus grants service connection for a lung disorder due to asbestos exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining a VA examination and confirming details of the Veteran's service aboard the U.S.S. ONSLOW.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board is remanding the case to obtain additional medical records and provide a VA physician with the Veteran's claims file for an opinion regarding whether his service-connected conditions contributed to his death. The appellant will also be provided VCAA notice.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disability, including pulmonary asbestosis, is being remanded due to the need to obtain private medical records from his primary care physician.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's asbestosis is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DismissedJuly 2010
The Veteran's claims for higher initial evaluations for bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy have been dismissed due to the failure to file a timely substantive appeal.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral hearing loss, right hip and left shoulder disability, right knee disability, acquired psychiatric disorder, and respiratory disability (claimed as lung disease due to asbestos exposure) have been dismissed due to the failure to file a timely substantive appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Veteran's asbestosis has been rated at 30 percent since September 9, 2002. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for right knee disorder, COPD or asbestosis, pulmonary hypertension, vascular hypertension, and sinusitis. The Board found that there was insufficient evidence to establish a link between these conditions and his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has granted service connection for asbestosis.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for asbestosis and finds that new and material evidence has been received. The Veteran now has a current diagnosis of asbestosis, which is considered to be related to his military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension, residuals of strokes, and a chronic respiratory disorder. The Veteran's hypertension is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II; the residuals of strokes are related to his hypertension; and the chronic respiratory disorder is related to asbestos exposure in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran is seeking service connection for a lung disability, including COPD and asbestosis. The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to adjudicate the claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development, including a VA examination and consideration of his TDIU claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional action, including affording him a VA examination and reviewing his claims file.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination and additional development of evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's claims of service connection for a bilateral shoulder disability and asbestosis, as well as his claim for TDIU, are being remanded due to incomplete development.
- Whole decision: GrantedJuly 2010
The Board finds that the Veteran's asbestosis is at least as likely as not attributable to his service in the U.S. Navy, and grants his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2010
The Veteran's service-connected asbestos-related lung disease does not render him unemployable due to his age and lack of qualifications for sedentary work.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2010
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a medical examination. The issues are whether he should receive higher ratings for his service-connected urticaria and asbestos-related pleural disease.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.