Asbestosis decisions — 2019
397 indexed Board decisions in 2019.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's asbestosis is granted with a non-compensable rating, and his tinnitus is granted based on service connection. The Board found that the Veteran experienced significant noise exposure during service which likely caused his tinnitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for asbestosis, finding no evidence linking his current condition to any event or disease incurred in service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for additional development, including medical examinations and evidence collection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for COPD and asbestosis due to insufficient evidence, including inadequate pulmonary function test results. The Veteran needs additional medical opinions regarding the etiology of his COPD and the severity of his asbestosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for his service-connected asbestosis has been remanded due to the addition of relevant VA-generated evidence. The case will be reconsidered with this new information.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to asbestos during service and his current asbestosis condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has decided that the evaluation for asbestosis should be remanded due to lack of rationale and contrary indications in the Schedule. The relationship between CHF and asbestosis needs clarification.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for alcoholism, asbestosis, and rheumatoid arthritis due to insufficient evidence regarding exposure in service and current diagnoses.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's respiratory disorder, including COPD, asbestosis, and pneumoconiosis, is granted service connection. Placement of an implantable cardiac pacemaker is denied due to lack of evidence linking it to active duty service. Ionizing radiation exposure is not considered a qualifying condition for VA benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete VA examination and the need for updated treatment records. The Veteran's asbestosis and sleep apnea are being evaluated further.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Board denied entitlement to a TDIU on both schedular and extraschedular grounds, finding that the Veteran's service-connected asbestosis did not meet the criteria for a TDIU rating due to his nonservice-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a lung disorder and asbestosis, finding that there is no evidence to support these conditions were incurred or aggravated during his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's employability and his service-connected disabilities. The Veteran was not provided with a formal TDIU application form, and the issue of entitlement to a TDIU on an extraschedular basis is referred to the Director of Compensation Service for further consideration.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2019
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for asbestosis has been dismissed due to his death.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of service connection for asbestosis disease disability, finding no current diagnosis and insufficient evidence to link it to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinions and conflicting diagnostic findings. The Veteran's pulmonary disabilities are being reviewed again with a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased rating for bilateral hearing loss and service connection for pulmonary fibrosis (asbestosis) due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for an adequate medical opinion regarding the nature and etiology of any current respiratory disorder, including asbestosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · September 2019
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is currently assigned a 10 percent evaluation. The Board has determined that the evidence supports a 20 percent evaluation for his bilateral hearing loss.,Service connection for type II diabetes mellitus (to include as due to herbicide exposure) and service connection for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (to include as due to asbestos and herbicide exposure) are stayed. The Veteran's claims will be reconsidered after the stay is lifted.,The Veteran has current right and left knee disorders that may be related to his military service, but a VA examination is needed to determine their etiology.,An initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for supraventricular arrhythmias is remanded. The Veteran's claims will be reconsidered after the stay is lifted.,The Veteran has current right and left knee disorders that may be related to his military service, but a VA examination is needed to determine their etiology.,An initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for supraventricular arrhythmias is remanded. The Veteran's claims will be reconsidered after the stay is lifted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient development regarding potential asbestos exposure during service and a need for a medical opinion on whether the Veteran's asbestosis is related to service or post-service work.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.