Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
5,203 vetted Board decisions for Asbestosis.
The Board has ordered additional development to obtain the Veteran's VA treatment records and a medical opinion regarding his presumed in-service asbestos exposure. The claim will be remanded for further consideration.
The case is being remanded for additional development, including a review of the Veteran's exposure to asbestos and a CT scan result. The Veteran will need to provide further evidence or clarification regarding his lung disability.
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations and further review of his medical records.
The Veteran's claim for an increased disability rating for service-connected pulmonary asbestosis is remanded due to the need for a current VA examination.
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for asbestos related pleural disease is being remanded due to the submission of additional medical evidence that has not yet been considered by the RO.
The Veteran seeks service connection for a respiratory disorder, including asbestosis claimed as secondary to asbestos exposure during service. The case is being remanded for further development and examination.
The Board has remanded the case for a medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's asbestosis is related to exposure in service. The TDIU claim is also being remanded.
The Board denied service connection for all claimed conditions, finding no evidence of a nexus between the Veteran's current disabilities and his military service.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for COPD, skin cancer, and skin rashes due to a lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.,There is no current diagnosis or evidence of skin cancer at any time during the appeal period.
The Veteran's service-connected asbestosis contributed to his death, which is now considered the cause of his death. The Board has granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death.
The Board has granted service connection for asbestosis and denied an initial compensable evaluation for the Veteran's hearing loss disability.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's asbestosis is related to his in-service asbestos exposure and grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's asbestosis was evaluated at a 30 percent rating, which is the lowest available under VA guidelines for this condition. The evidence did not meet the criteria for an increased rating.
The Board found no evidence of current diagnosis of asbestosis and concluded that the Veteran does not have a present disability related to service connection for asbestosis.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's asbestosis warrants a disability rating of 30 percent since September 3, 2010, based on his pulmonary function test results showing Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Diffusion Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide by the Single Breath Method (DLCO (SB)) meeting the criteria for a 30 percent rating under Diagnostic Code 6833.
The Veteran's claims of service connection for various conditions have been remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and issuing a statement of the case for increased evaluations.
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for bronchitis, multiple calcified pleural plaques in both lungs (claimed as asbestosis), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy with pacemaker installation, and bilateral knee disability. The evidence received since the September 2007 RO decision is new and material, raising a reasonable possibility of substantiating the underlying claim for service connection.
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for a shortness of breath disability due to asbestos exposure, but denied reopening his claim for Hepatitis C disability.,A VA examination is needed to determine the etiology of the Veteran's COPD disability.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim of entitlement to a total rating based on individual unemployability due to inadequate VA examinations and the need for further development.
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals on initial ratings for left knee disability due to his withdrawal of the appeal before a decision was made.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.