Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
5,203 vetted Board decisions for Asbestosis.
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been received to reopen the Veteran's previously denied claims of service connection for asbestosis and hypertension. The claim of service connection for PTSD remains denied.
The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings for Major Depressive Disorder, tinnitus, and asbestosis have been withdrawn. The appeal regarding TDIU was also dismissed. Asbestos exposure is not considered a factor in the Veteran's respiratory symptoms or hearing loss.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current disability involving in-service asbestos exposure and therefore, service connection for asbestosis is denied.
The Veteran's in-service exposure to asbestos is at least as likely as not related to the development of asbestos-related pleural plaques, which are a form of lung disease. The Board grants service connection for this condition.
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable evaluation for asbestosis is being remanded due to the need for a new VA examination.
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have asbestosis or sarcoidosis that is related to his military service.
The Veteran's claims for higher initial ratings were denied. The VA found that the scars and nerve paralysis did not warrant a compensable rating.
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been denied. The RO found no evidence of exposure to Agent Orange or other herbicide agents during his military service, and thus could not grant service connection based on presumptive exposure. Additionally, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for secondary service connection due to underlying Type II diabetes mellitus.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss and lung disorder to include asbestosis or ionizing radiation due to incomplete development, including obtaining additional medical records and conducting further examinations.
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claim for service connection for an asbestos-related lung disease due to exposure during military service. The case is being returned for further development, including verification of asbestos exposure and a VA examination.
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for further development of the evidence and due process development, including adjudicating a new claim for an increased rating for asbestos-related pleural plaques. The T/R issue will be reconsidered in light of all service-connected disabilities.
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to his death while the appeal was pending.
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are denied. The Veteran has been granted service connection for tinnitus, but the maximum disability rating is already assigned.
The Veteran is seeking a TDIU based on his service-connected asbestosis and PTSD. The Board has determined that additional development, including a VA examination to assess the impact of these conditions on employment, is necessary.
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current respiratory disorder, claimed as asbestosis, is at least as likely as not related to his in-service exposure to asbestos. As a result, service connection for this condition is granted.
The Board has remanded the claims due to failure of the Veteran to report for VA examinations and requests that he provide information about his treatment history. The case will be returned after further development.
The Board found that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen the claim for service connection for asbestosis, resulting in a denial of the Veteran's appeal.
The Board has remanded the case for further proceedings due to inadequate examination and new claims related to secondary service connection.
The appellant's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable due to their severity.
The Veteran's service-connected asbestosis was found to be as likely as not manifested by Forced Vital Capacity of 50 to 64 percent of predicted value between January 1, 2007, and September 28, 2009, warranting a 60% rating.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.