Asbestosis Board decisions

The Veteran's asbestosis disability is rated at 60 percent, meeting the minimum schedular criteria for TDIU. The Board finds that the Veteran is unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected asbestosis.

The Veteran is seeking an evaluation in excess of 10 percent for service-connected asbestosis. The Board finds that there is a further duty to assist the Veteran with his claim and schedules a new VA examination.

The Board found that the Veteran does not currently suffer from asbestosis, and there is no evidence linking his current conditions to service or a service-connected disability. As such, service connection for asbestosis, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and skin rash was denied.

The Board denied service connection for asbestosis and lumbar spine disability, finding that the Veteran's pre-existing lumbar spine disability was not aggravated by service. The claim for asbestosis remains pending.

The Veteran's appeal was denied for his claims of service connection for various conditions, including bilateral eye disability, left ankle and foot disabilities, asbestosis, right hip osteoarthritis with labral tears, left knee disability, and left hip tear. The RO found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for an eye disability.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for lead poisoning, lung disability as the residual of asbestos exposure, and diabetes mellitus were denied. The evidence does not support these claims.

The Board finds that the Veteran's diagnosed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is not due to exposure to asbestos in service, nor is such disability otherwise related to his military service. The Veteran has been granted a new and material issue of reopening his claim for asbestosis but does not have evidence linking it to service.

The Board found that the Veteran did not have a current diagnosis of asbestosis or COPD, and there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service. As such, the claims for service connection were denied.

The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including a VA examination and clarification of the Veteran's hearing preferences.

The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete development of the Veteran's work history and employment records, as well as his exposure history. The claim will be reconsidered in light of all pertinent evidence.

The Veteran's claims for service connection are denied as the evidence does not support a link between his claimed conditions and his military service.

The Board has granted service connection for asbestosis and is granting the benefits sought on appeal. The Veteran's claims of entitlement to special home adaptation grant and specially adapted housing are pending.

The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination to evaluate his lung conditions.

The Veteran's COPD with a history of asbestosis is currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board finds that his disability does not warrant an increase in rating.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's asbestosis is related to his service and granted his claim for service connection.

The Board denied service connection for COPD as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected asbestosis, and denied an initial compensable rating for asbestosis with pleural plaques.

The Board has determined that the Veteran's asbestos-related lung disease is related to his service exposure, and thus grants service connection for asbestosis.

The Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions were denied. The Board found no evidence of in-service injury or disease, and the Veteran did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection due to exposure to herbicide agents.,Compensation benefits for a prostate disorder were also denied.

The Veteran's respiratory disability, including asbestosis, has been rated at 30 percent since February 11, 2005. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the criteria in the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities.

The Board found that the Veteran's claimed residuals of asbestos exposure are not related to his military service or any incident therein, and thus denied his claim for service connection.