Asthma decisions — 2010
369 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Board has granted service connection for COPD and asthma, finding that the appellant's current respiratory disability is due to in-service exposure. The issue of an increased evaluation for asthma remains pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete treatment records and the need for VA examinations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to incomplete medical records and lack of authorization from the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The maximum schedular evaluation for the status post salpingoophorectomy was granted, but no additional evaluations were warranted.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's respiratory disorder, including asthma and COPD, was incurred in active service due to aggravation of a preexisting condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's psychiatric disorder did not onset in service and is not causally related to service. The claim for asthma was remanded due to incomplete rationale in the VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2010
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records from VA clinics where the Veteran was treated for asthma. The appellant must provide new authorization forms for these records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran is seeking service connection for asthma, which he claims developed during active duty training in Turkey. The Board finds that additional development is necessary to determine the nature and etiology of his respiratory disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses incurred at Sacred Heart Hospital on January 3, 2005 is granted as the services were provided in an emergency and no VA facilities were feasibly available.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's service-connected asthma is currently rated at 60 percent, effective August 20, 2005. The Board found that the evidence did not support a higher rating for any period of time covered by the appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's respiratory disorder (asthma) is found to have been incurred in service, and the Board grants service connection for this condition. The remaining issues on appeal are addressed in the REMAND portion of the decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for PTSD and back disability were denied, while his claim to reopen a previously denied asthma claim was granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for asthma and emphysema due to asbestos exposure is being remanded for further development, including obtaining his treatment records from the Spokane VAMC.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a respiratory disability, including asthma, is being remanded due to the need to consider additional evidence not previously considered by the RO.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran was granted service connection for asthma effective January 30, 1991, the day following his separation from active duty.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2010
The Veteran's asthma was rated at 30 percent prior to June 24, 2005 and at 60 percent on or after that date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the relationship between the Veteran's asthma and her service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings for bronchial asthma and hay fever have been remanded due to the inadequacy of the most recent VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · September 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's current asthma did not originate in service or for many years thereafter, and is not related to any incident during active service, including his presumed in-service Agent Orange exposure. As such, the claim for service connection for asthma was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)September 2010
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to inconsistencies in medical records and the need for a VA examination to assess the appellant's functional ability.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.