Back / lumbar spine decisions — 2013
4,951 indexed Board decisions in 2013.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for a more contemporaneous examination to evaluate the current severity of his degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining updated VA and private treatment records, as well as scheduling the Veteran for appropriate VA examinations to assess her current low back and right hip disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has found that additional development is required before the Veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for lower back disability can be decided. The case is REMANDED to obtain medical records, schedule a VA examination, and readjudicate the claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the claim of entitlement to service connection for a lumbar spine disability, and thus the claim remains denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2013
The Veteran withdrew her appeal for an increased evaluation for low back pain before the Board could make a decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for right shoulder, low back, left leg, and right leg disabilities. However, these claims are being REMANDED to obtain additional information from the Veteran regarding his factory job in 1982 and to schedule appropriate VA examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Veteran's cervical spine disability is currently rated as 30 percent disabling, the maximum rating assignable for limitation of motion. The Board finds no evidence of unfavorable ankylosis or other conditions that would warrant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining service treatment records and a medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's lumbar spine and sciatic nerve disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for a right ankle disorder and granted service connection for tinnitus. The claims of service connection for bilateral hearing loss, right index finger disorder, left ankle disorder, headache disorder (migraines), and back disorder are denied. Service connection for hemorrhoids is not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to fully and fairly consider the Veteran's claims, including obtaining medical records from specific providers and examining his current disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for right and left sciatic nerve impingement, diagnosed as sacroiliitis, and low back disability, diagnosed variously as sacroiliacs and low back strain. The Board found that there was no evidence of a nexus between these conditions and service or any service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current low back condition is not related to his active military service, and thus denied service connection for a low back disorder.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Veteran's low back disorder, rated as 40 percent disabling since September 1967, is found to preclude him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment due to his service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied. The initial compensable rating for dyspepsia was not granted, and the claim for a higher rating for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar spine, right shoulder, left ankle, and right ankle disabilities. The issues of entitlement to service connection for a cervical spine disorder and a right elbow disorder were also addressed but are pending on remand.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to incomplete development of his claims, specifically regarding the effect of flare-ups on his spine disability and whether pain significantly limits functional ability during flare-ups or when used repeatedly over a period of time.
- Whole decision: DeniedOctober 2013
The Board found that the Veteran's lumbar spine disability was not incurred or aggravated by service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2013
The Board has remanded the TDIU claim for further development, including obtaining a VA medical opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation. The case is also being returned to the RO with updated treatment records and readjudicated.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2013
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected degenerative disc disease of the lumbosacral spine was granted, with a current evaluation of 40 percent effective June 14, 2013.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedOctober 2013
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to secure and follow a substantially gainful occupation from July 24, 2002 to September 20, 2004. The Board finds that the evidence is in equipoise on whether he was disabled due to his service-connected conditions.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.