Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
185,176 indexed Board decisions for Back / lumbar spine.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for migraine headaches has been denied as there is no evidence linking the current condition to his military service.,The Board found that the Veteran's low back disability and stomach condition need further development due to insufficient medical opinions addressing the Veteran's lay statements and STRs.
The Veteran's appeal for an increased disability rating for lumbosacral spine strain and service connection for bilateral bunion formation were both denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for a higher disability rating or service connection due to lack of evidence showing forward flexion limited to 30 degrees or less, or unfavorable ankylosis.
The Board denied service connection for a left index finger disability, a lumbar spine (back) disability, and a right foot/ankle disability. The Veteran's claims were remanded for additional examinations.,Service connection was not granted as the evidence did not support a link between any of these disabilities and service.
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, including those for gastrointestinal disorders and hemorrhoids secondary to hepatitis C. The rating for hepatitis C remains under review, as does the effective date for PTSD.
The Board has found that the Veteran does not have neuropathy of either upper extremity and is therefore denying service connection for this condition. The cervical spine, lumbar spine, left elbow, right elbow, left shoulder, and right shoulder disorders are remanded for further review.
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for low back disorder and right knee disorder due to insufficient evidence linking these conditions to his military service. The case is being remanded for further development, including obtaining a medical opinion regarding the onset of the right knee disorder.
The Veteran is granted a TDIU from September 9, 2011, through February 24, 2014, and from May 2, 2016, to present. The Board remanded the case for further development regarding the period from May 28, 2011, through September 8, 2011.
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU are being remanded due to the need to obtain additional medical records, provide the requested VA examiner's CV, and address other issues awaiting adjudication.
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient examination and opinion regarding the Veteran's back condition. The Veteran is seeking service connection for a back condition that she asserts resulted from her military occupational specialty as a petroleum supply specialist.
The Board has decided to remand the cases for additional development due to incomplete records and an inadequate nexus opinion. The low back strain claim is being remanded because of missing private treatment records, while the TDIU claim is being remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with the service connection issue.
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for tinnitus, chemical hypersensitivity, fatigue and soreness disorder, back disorder, skin disorder, memory loss disorder, skin cancers, and sleep apnea due to insufficient evidence regarding their relationship to service. The claims are being returned for additional examinations and medical opinions.
The Veteran's back disability is now rated at 40 percent, effective July 27, 2021. Ratings for his right and left lower extremity sciatic nerve radiculopathy were also granted with a 20 percent rating each, effective May 31, 2013.
The Veteran's back disability is denied as there is no evidence of a chronic in-service condition and no credible continuity of symptomatology.,The Veteran's bilateral ankle disabilities are denied due to lack of current diagnosis and no credible continuity of symptomatology since service.,The Veteran's bilateral foot disabilities are denied because the Veteran did not have any diagnosed foot or ankle conditions during service, and there is no evidence of aggravation in-service.,The Veteran's skin disorder is denied as there is no current diagnosis and no credible continuity of symptomatology.,The Veteran's headaches are denied due to lack of a chronic in-service condition and no credible continuity of symptomatology.,The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is denied as there is no current diagnosis and no credible continuity of symptomatology.,The Veteran's tinnitus is denied due to lack of a chronic in-service condition and no credible continuity of symptomatology.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unemployable, and the Board denies entitlement to a TDIU on both schedular and extraschedular grounds.
The Veteran's lumbar strain is currently rated at 40 percent, which does not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of this rating.
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a back disability was reopened, and the Board remanded the case to obtain VA examinations and opinions. The current examination and opinions are inadequate.
The Veteran's fibromyalgia is granted an initial rating of 40 percent, and a separate compensable rating of 30 percent for headaches. The lumbosacral spine disability remains at 20 percent, while the cervical spine disability is denied any increase beyond the current 10 percent.
The Board has determined that the VA examinations and opinions are inadequate for rating purposes, necessitating further examination to determine the etiology of the Veteran's conditions.
The Board has denied a higher rating for the Veteran's sacroiliac joint and lumbar spine degenerative disease prior to October 1, 2018. The case is remanded for further examination regarding his left shoulder impingement syndrome.
The Board has remanded the cases for further development due to deficiencies in the prior examinations and lack of retrospective findings. The Veteran's service-connected back disability is being evaluated again, including pain assessment and flare-ups.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.