Back / lumbar spine Board decisions
185,176 indexed Board decisions for Back / lumbar spine.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for an increased rating for his lumbosacral spine disability and TDIU prior to February 14, 2016 due to inadequate medical examination and lack of retrospective opinion.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's initial claim for a higher rating for his lumbar strain with canal stenosis, spondylosis and facet joint disease was denied.,For the period from May 24, 2010 to March 18, 2019, the Veteran received a 20 percent rating. However, this was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Veteran's degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine with intervertebral disc syndrome is rated at 40 percent, effective from January 2015.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Veteran's PTSD resulted in occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas prior to February 25, 2019. However, the evidence did not meet the criteria for a higher rating.,The Veteran was unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation due to his service-connected disabilities, including PTSD and DDD of the cervical spine, prior to February 25, 2019.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's appeal for higher ratings and service connection for PTSD, lumbar spine disorder, left foot disorder, and hemorrhoids is denied. The Board finds that a higher rating of 70 percent is warranted for PTSD prior to February 28, 2020, but not from that date forward. Service connection for the lumbar spine and left foot disorders are remanded due to insufficient medical opinions. Service connection for hemorrhoids is also remanded as there was no clarification on its onset during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient examination reports regarding the Veteran's service-connected disabilities and their impact on his daily functioning. The Veteran needs an addendum opinion from a physician to determine if he is substantially confined or requires regular aid and attendance.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied service connection for bilateral shoulder disabilities, internal bleeding, and radiculopathy of the right side. The cervical spine disability was not granted due to lack of evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient rationale in the VA examiner's opinions regarding the Veteran's cervical spine disability and its relationship to service. The claims file should be returned for further development, including obtaining an adequate etiological opinion that considers the Veteran's lay statements about symptoms prior to his 1987 post-service work-related injury.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection of left foot, left hand, and back conditions are remanded due to the need for VA examinations.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for his low back disability, finding that there was no evidence of a direct relationship to service or secondary aggravation by his service-connected left knee disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU were denied. The osteochondral defect of the right ankle is rated at its maximum schedular rating, while the degenerative changes of the lumbar spine are not entitled to higher ratings under either the General Rating Formula or the Formula for Rating IVDS Based on Incapacitating Episodes.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Board denied service connection for a lower back disorder, finding that the Veteran's current condition did not begin during his honorable period of active duty and there was no causal relationship to in-service injury or disease.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Veteran's claims for PTSD, hypertension, and other conditions are being remanded due to the need for additional evidence or clarification. The effective dates for some of his service-connected disabilities remain unresolved.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Board has granted an initial 100 percent rating for PTSD prior to August 29, 2019 and has also granted service connection for a lumbar spine disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Board has granted service connection for low back and neck disabilities, attributing the diagnoses to the cumulative impact of parachute jumps during military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has withdrawn the Veteran's appeals for service connection of right and left knee disabilities due to his oral withdrawal during a personal hearing. The low back disability appeal is remanded for further examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2020
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for various conditions, including back disability, right and left lower extremity radiculopathy, bilateral plantar fasciitis and flatfeet, and allergic rhinitis were denied as the evidence did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2020
The Veteran's right knee disability is rated at 10 percent, and a separate rating of 10 percent for the varus deformity of his right knee is granted. The Veteran's lumbar spine disability is rated at 20 percent from October 8, 2019.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's lumbar spine disability, bladder impairment, and radiculopathy. The main reasons for remand include obtaining clarification of private opinions regarding the severity of the lumbar spine disability, scheduling a new VA examination to assess the extent of functional loss during flare-ups or after repetitive use, and determining whether the Veteran’s lay reports of
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2020
The Board has decided to remand the cases for additional development and readjudication due to new VA records being added to the file.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.