Back / lumbar spine Board decisions
185,176 indexed Board decisions for Back / lumbar spine.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have current diagnoses for most of his claimed conditions and finds no evidence to support service connection for these disorders. The only condition found by the Board with a possible link to service is dementia, but this was many years after service.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's initial claim for higher ratings for cervical spine disability and left cervical radiculopathy was denied. The Veteran is not entitled to an increased rating for his service-connected conditions during the period of appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Board has granted service connection for fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, acid reflux disease, sleep apnea, and obesity as secondary to PTSD. The Veteran's low back disorder is denied due to lack of a current diagnosis. Service connection for asthma and diabetes mellitus are remanded for additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current left hip disability, and therefore, this claim is denied.,Service connection for low back, bilateral knee, right hip, and bilateral ankle disabilities are not supported by the evidence. The preponderance of the evidence shows these conditions were due to post-service injuries from working in manual labor as a truck driver, roofer, and construction worker.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's lumbar spine disability has been rated at 40 percent since June 20, 2016. This rating is based on the presence of unfavorable ankylosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's claims for lumbar spine disorder, right lower extremity disorder, acquired psychiatric disorder, respiratory disorder, and hypertension were denied in July 2005. The Veteran did not appeal these decisions or submit new and material evidence within a year of the decision.,No new and material evidence was received to reopen any of the previously denied claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions are not related to his active service, including as due to exposure to tactical herbicides.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Veteran would have been in receipt of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability for at least 10 years immediately preceding his death but for clear and unmistakable error (CUE) in the June 2003 VA rating decision. As such, the criteria for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 are satisfied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU were denied. The headaches claim was not granted due to lack of characteristic prostrating attacks, while the lumbosacral strain claim had no evidence of incapacitating episodes warranting a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's service-connected low back and cervical spine disabilities have resulted in a TDIU due to their severity.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn, and the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's appeal was denied, with the issues of left and right ankle disability ratings being addressed. The claim for CUE in a prior rating decision regarding low back disability was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's osteoarthritis of the bilateral knees and low back did not manifest during service or within one year of separation, and is not shown to be causally related to an in-service event, injury or disease. The preponderance of evidence supports a finding that there was no in-service incurrence or aggravation of a disease or injury.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's chronic lumbar strain, L5-S1, with history of discectomy, was granted a 40 percent rating effective from June 1, 2009 to February 3, 2011.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's back disability has been rated at 10 percent for constant pain and limited range of motion, but does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on functional loss or incapacitating episodes. The Board finds that his current disability picture does not warrant an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection of various conditions, including diabetes mellitus, skin disorder, lumbar spine disorder, bilateral foot disorder, neuropathy of the lower extremities, and hypertension, were denied as they are not attributable to his time at Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Veteran is granted a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities from July 31, 2008 to September 16, 2012.
- Whole decision: GrantedSeptember 2017
The Board has granted service connection for a neck disability, finding that the Veteran's current neck condition is etiologically related to his active service. The issue of service connection for a back disability remains pending and will be addressed in a future remand.
- Whole decision: DismissedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by his representative, leaving no issues for further consideration.
- Whole decision: DeniedSeptember 2017
The Veteran's lumbar spine degenerative disc disease and radiculopathy were found to not warrant an increased evaluation prior to October 14, 2011. From that date onwards, the evaluations for both conditions remained at 10 percent and 20 percent respectively.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.