Back / lumbar spine Board decisions
185,176 indexed Board decisions for Back / lumbar spine.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Board has ordered additional development to obtain records from the Veteran's service and post-service treatment, as well as a new VA examination. The appeal will be remanded for these actions.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Board found that the Veteran's current cervical spine disorder is not related to his period of service and denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2014
The Board finds that the Veteran's current TBI residuals and low back disability are at least as likely as not incurred in service, with the most probative evidence showing a history of treatment for these conditions during his military service. The examiner considered the Veteran's civilian occupation and recreational activities but did not discount the likelihood of an in-service injury contributing to his current disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for bilateral pes planus, a bilateral leg disability, and a low back disability. The decision also found that new and material evidence had not been received to reopen the claim of service connection for bilateral pes planus.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions, including back disability, cervical spine disability, and right shoulder disability, are not related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2014
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for a low back condition and granted it. The claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, separate from PTSD, is also granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining a VA examination to address the nature and etiology of his tinnitus claim, as well as determining the current severity of his service-connected right shoulder bursitis. The AOJ must also consider whether staged ratings are appropriate in light of Hart v. Mansfield.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for low back and bilateral hip disabilities are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Board finds that the Veteran's claimed back and right shoulder disorders did not manifest during service or within one year of separation, and there is no credible evidence to support a finding of in-service injury. The claim for a right thumb and little finger disorder cannot be substantiated as there is no current diagnosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining SSA disability records and private treatment records from Sacramento, California. The Veteran's right ankle and low back disabilities are also being examined to determine their relationship to service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Veteran's appeals for service connection and increased ratings have been withdrawn. The Board has determined that the Veteran's GERD with IBS warrants a 30 percent rating throughout the appeal period, but no higher.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an effective date earlier than July 17, 2007 for the grant of SMC based on a need for aid and attendance. The issues regarding increased ratings for various service-connected disabilities were also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation of his service-connected lumbosacral spine strain is being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being REMANDED for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the severity of his low back disability. The TDIU claim will also be addressed.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2014
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings were denied as his conditions did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under the applicable rating criteria.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2014
The Board has granted the Veteran's request to reopen his claim for service connection for a back disability and has also granted the claim for service connection for a left hand disability. The appeal on the issue of service connection for a foot disability was withdrawn by the Veteran.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including VA examinations to determine the nature and etiology of her back disability and TMJ.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a new examination to assess the severity of his low back disability. The issue of entitlement to TDIU has also been raised due to evidence suggesting he may be unemployable at least in part due to his service-connected low back disability.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2014
The Board has granted service connection for avascular necrosis of the right hip, left hip, and lumbar spine spondylosis, degenerative disc disease, and disc herniation status-post discectomy due to injuries sustained during active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2014
The Board has granted service connection for a left foot disability and rhinitis, but denied service connection for a left finger disability and back disability.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.