Back / lumbar spine Board decisions
185,176 indexed Board decisions for Back / lumbar spine.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for right and left knee retropatellar pain syndrome were remanded by the Board, but no effective date earlier than March 31, 2004 is granted.,An effective date of March 31, 2004 was assigned for the 10% rating for both knees.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection for neck, upper back, and right leg conditions are being remanded due to the need for further development of his medical records and a VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's combined disability rating for his service-connected conditions is currently at 40 percent, effective January 1, 2005. The Board finds no error in the calculation and denies the claim for a higher combined rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board finds that the Veteran's current hearing loss is more likely due to presbycusis or age-related changes, rather than service connection. For his back, hip and leg disabilities, additional VA examination is needed to determine their etiology.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has determined that further development is needed to determine if the Veteran's current low back and lower extremity disabilities are related to his military service. The case is therefore REMANDED for additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's claim for a temporary total disability rating based on the need for convalescence following lumbar spine surgery in 1985 was denied as his claim was not filed within one year of any need for convalescence ending.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Veteran's chronic lumbosacral strain has been granted service connection and rated at 20 percent since January 12, 2006. The rating is based on the criteria for a chronic lumbosacral strain.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability has been rated at 20 percent since June 9, 2008, and the Board finds that this rating is warranted based on his current range of motion limitations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a low back disability as secondary to right ankle disability, an increased evaluation for his right ankle disability, and TDIU are being remanded due to the need for additional development of evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development and examination, including a new VA examination by a different physician.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's lumbosacral strain is currently rated at 40 percent, which is the maximum schedular rating available for this condition. The Board denied an increased evaluation beyond this level.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's lumbar strain is not manifested by forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees, a combined range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine not greater than 120 degrees; or muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour. Therefore, his claim for an increased rating is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's low back disorder, bilateral lower extremity neuropathy, and bilateral hip disorders were not proximately caused by VA carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment or similar instance of fault on the part of VA. The events leading to these disabilities did not occur during VA treatment.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedAugust 2012
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected left eye retinal hole and pterygium was denied due to failure to report for necessary VA examinations.,New evidence received since the January 2005 denial has reopened the claims of service connection for a right knee disability and thoracolumbar spine disability, raising reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and a back disorder, both claimed as secondary to his service-connected left lower extremity edema, are being remanded due to the need to obtain treatment records from Dr. W.G., the Veteran's counselor, and to provide addendum opinions regarding the nature of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's intervertebral disc syndrome with degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine is currently rated at 10 percent, but does not meet the criteria for a higher rating based on functional impairment or incapacitating episodes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to missing VA examination records and updated treatment reports.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has granted service connection for right knee strain and low back strain, finding that the Veteran's current disabilities are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that the reduction in the disability rating for the service-connected musculotendinous strain of the lumbar/thoracic spine from 40% to 10% was proper and effective May 1, 2008.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection of low back disability and granted it. The claims for myopia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were withdrawn by the Veteran.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.