Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
185,175 vetted Board decisions for Back / lumbar spine.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, substance abuse, low back condition, and right ankle condition. The claim of entitlement to an increased evaluation of the left knee condition was also denied as a matter of law.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased rating, service connection for right and left knee disorders, and reopening of his low back disorder claim. The fascial hernia of the left leg was not found to warrant a higher than 10% rating.
The veteran's service-connected dorsal lumbar back strain was rated at 20 percent prior to September 5, 2003 and increased to 40 percent on and after that date.
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for back and shoulder disabilities, finding no evidence of current disability related to events in service.
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection of a low back disability. The veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 70 percent disabling, but the Board denied an increased rating and did not address the issue of whether there was clear and unmistakable error in previous decisions.
The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for increased ratings for PTSD, Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbar Spine, and Bilateral Hearing Loss have been denied as there is no evidence to support a higher rating under the applicable criteria.
The Board granted a 20 percent rating for the service-connected residuals of a left knee injury with degenerative joint disease and assigned a separate 10 percent rating for tinnitus. The claims for bilateral hearing loss and low back disorder were also granted.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a cervical spine disability, an increased evaluation for his lumbar spine disability, and initial evaluations in excess of 10 percent for radiculopathy of the lower extremities. The TDIU claim was also denied.
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate examination and will re-adjudicate the claim after obtaining new opinions.
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for additional development, including obtaining medical records and a special examination. The veteran's claim for service connection for a back disorder will be reconsidered based on the new evidence.
The veteran's bilateral pes planus is rated as mild and not service-connected. The right shoulder disorder and low back disorder are also not service-connected.
The Board has granted a 60% rating for the veteran's service-connected left knee hemiarthroplasty, but denied his claim for secondary service connection of a low back disorder to his bilateral knee disabilities.
The Board has determined that the veteran's low back disability warrants a 60 percent rating, which is the highest available under the old criteria for strains and intervertebral disc syndrome (IDS).
The Board has determined that the veteran's low back disability and headaches did not begin during service or due to disease or injury in service, thus denying his claims for service connection.
The Board denied the veteran's claim of service connection for a back disability, concluding that there was no evidence to support a link between his current condition and events during military service.
The Board denied the claims for increased ratings for low back syndrome, right wrist scar from ganglion cystectomy, left wrist ganglion cyst, and left hand laceration repair scar.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for osteoporosis of the left knee, an increased rating for PTSD, and a compensable evaluation for epidermophytosis. The low back disability claim was partially granted with a 40% rating prior to September 26, 2003, and a 40% rating from that date forward.
The Board denied the veteran's service connection claim for a lumbar spine disability and his earlier effective date claim for non-service connected pension benefits. The Board found that there was no evidence of a chronic back disability in service, and that the current lumbar spine disability is less likely related to service. The earlier effective date claim was also denied as the veteran's entitlement to non-service connected pension arose on July 25, 2003.
The Board found that the veteran's low back disability was not incurred in or aggravated by service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current low back disability is not related to his service and thus denied his claim for service connection.
← Back to Back / lumbar spine overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.