Bipolar disorder decisions — 2007
281 indexed Board decisions in 2007.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The veteran's psychiatric disability has increased in severity due to her service-connected post-operative retinal detachments with diplopia, both eyes. The Board finds that the veteran's psychiatric disability is aggravated by her service-connected condition and grants service connection for this degree of additional impairment.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2007
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of bipolar disorder was denied as the first claim for service connection was received on July 31, 1997.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2007
The veteran's service-connected bipolar disorder is currently rated at 50 percent, but the Board has determined that a higher 70 percent rating is warranted due to occupational and social impairment with deficiencies in most areas.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedApril 2007
The veteran's service-connected dysthymia was rated at 10 percent prior to February 16, 2000 and later increased to 50 percent for dysthymia with bipolar disorder, type II. The RO denied ratings in excess of these levels.,For the period from August 6, 1999 to February 16, 2000, the veteran's dysthymia was rated at 10 percent due to occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform tasks. From February 16, 2000, the rating for dysthymia with bipolar disorder, type II, was increased to 50 percent.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2007
The veteran's claim for service connection for psychiatric disabilities, including bipolar disorder and PTSD, is being remanded due to the lack of available service medical records. The RO or AMC will attempt to locate these records and provide notice in accordance with Dingess/Hartman v. Nicholson.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The VA has determined that the veteran's service-connected bipolar disorder does not warrant a disability rating in excess of 50 percent, as his symptoms do not meet the criteria for a higher rating under Diagnostic Code 9432.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims of service connection for degenerative disc disease and bipolar disorder, finding that there was no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's psychiatric disability, including bipolar disorder, was not incurred or aggravated by active service and therefore denied his claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2007
The veteran is seeking to challenge the October 28, 2003 rating decision that awarded a 100 percent evaluation for PTSD with bipolar disorder effective October 14, 2003. The case is being remanded due to procedural issues and the need to adjudicate both the CUE claim and the initial evaluation issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The Board found that the veteran did not sustain a skull injury in service and that his current mental disorders are not related to any incident during service. As such, the claim for service connection was denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's bipolar disorder is likely related to his military service, and thus grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The veteran's claims for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder and major depression, and bilateral hearing loss were denied by the Board of Veterans' Appeals.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The Board has denied the veteran's claim for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, as there is no clinical evidence of a chronic condition during or within one year after service.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected bipolar disorder warrants a 70 percent rating, reflecting significant occupational and social impairment.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for a psychiatric disorder, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, bipolar disorder and schizoaffective disorder. The evidence did not show that any of these conditions were incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2007
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence and missing treatment records, requiring a de novo review of the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2007
The veteran does not have a separate depressive disorder apart from his already service-connected bipolar disorder, and therefore the claim for service connection for depression is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2007
The veteran's service-connected disabilities, rated at a combined level of 70 percent, are shown to be productive on an overall level social and industrial incapacity as to preclude her from performing any form of substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2007
The Board has determined that the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of bipolar disorder, depressive type should be granted as his application to reopen was received on July 8, 1997. The effective date is set at this date.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2007
The veteran is seeking to reopen his claim for service connection for a mental condition claimed as bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia. The Board has determined that new and material evidence must be submitted before the claim can be reopened.
← Back to Bipolar disorder overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.