Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
6,216 vetted Board decisions for Chronic bronchitis.
The veteran withdrew the appeal, and the Board has no jurisdiction to review it.
The Veteran's effective date for the assignment of a 70 percent disability rating for PTSD and total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities (TDIU) was granted as August 19, 1993.
The veteran withdrew his appeal for an increased rating, and the Board dismissed the claim.
The appeal was remanded to the RO for scheduling of a Travel Board Hearing.
The Veteran was granted a 40 percent rating for degenerative changes of the lumbar spine prior to February 4, 2008 and a 30 percent evaluation for calcaneal spurs of both feet. However, no increased ratings were granted for seborrheah dermatitis or bronchitis.
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for chronic bronchitis, epididymitis, chronic disability manifested by allergies, bilateral knee disability, and a back disability as there was no competent medical evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
The Board granted service connection for PTSD and gastroduodenitis, but denied service connection for a back disability, chronic respiratory disorder, insomnia, and an increased rating for diabetes mellitus.
The Board denied increased ratings for cluster headaches, chronic bronchitis, scoliosis of the lumbar spine, and tinnitus, as the evidence did not support higher ratings under applicable criteria.
The claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus was reopened and granted, while the claim for a respiratory condition was denied.
The Board denied service connection for a chronic respiratory disability, including chronic allergic rhinitis and chronic bronchitis.
The veteran's claim for service connection for allergic bronchitis with early emphysema was denied due to a lack of new and material evidence, as the previous denial in September 2000 found no medical nexus between his current condition and his military service.
The Veteran's respiratory disability was rated at 30 percent from June 2001 to March 2003, then increased to 60 percent until March 2006, and reduced back to 30 percent thereafter.
The Board denied service connection for bronchitis, a degenerative condition of the skeletal system, and scars as there was no competent evidence linking these conditions to active service or herbicide exposure.
The Board remands the case to obtain additional evidence and schedule a VA examination.
The appeal for service connection for a low back disorder was denied as there is no competent evidence linking the condition to service.
The veteran's claims for service connection for a respiratory disability, bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, an eye disability, and a dental condition were denied as there was no evidence of a nexus to his military service.
The Board denied service connection for PTSD, low back disability, bilateral foot disability, sleep apnea, bronchitis and carpal tunnel syndrome as the evidence did not show that any of these conditions were incurred in or aggravated by active military service.
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date was denied as the RO assigned the earliest possible effective date, which is the date of receipt of the application to reopen, November 15, 2005.
The veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on the need for regular aid and attendance or by reason of being permanently housebound has been remanded due to a lack of recent medical evidence indicating he is in need of such assistance.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for bronchitis, Graves disease, diabetes mellitus (claimed as secondary to Graves disease), heart disease (claimed as secondary to Graves disease), and residuals of injuries of the eyes, to include loss of vision. The reasons were that these conditions did not manifest during active service or are not related to any in-service event.
← Back to Chronic bronchitis overview
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.