Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
72,607 vetted Board decisions for Depression.
The Board found that the appellant's psychiatric or cognitive disorder was not incurred in or aggravated by service.
The Board has determined that the veteran's current psychiatric conditions, including PTSD, are related to her in-service sexual assault and is granting service connection for these conditions.
The veteran's claim for service connection for depression is being remanded due to the unavailability of his service medical records and the need for a VA examination.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to his service-connected disabilities, finding that he failed without good cause to report for a necessary examination and that there was no evidence of unemployability as a result of his service-connected conditions.
The Board found that the veteran did not provide credible evidence of an in-service stressor for PTSD, and thus denied service connection. The claim for depression was remanded.
The Board has determined that the veteran's anxiety disorder with depression is a result of an anaphylactic reaction to vancomycin administered by VA, which caused additional disability. The claim for benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is granted.
The VA denied the veteran's claim for a higher disability rating for his PTSD with major depressive disorder, finding that his symptoms did not warrant an evaluation in excess of 30 percent.
The Board has granted a higher disability rating of 100 percent for the veteran's PTSD, effective February 27, 2004. The decision is based on total occupational and social impairment due to PTSD.
The Board has remanded the case for a clarification on whether any diagnosed psychiatric disorder is related to service, including treatment for colon cancer in 1968.
The Board found that the veteran's myopia preexisted service and was not aggravated by service, thus denying his claim for service connection. The depression claim was also denied as it is not attributable to military service.
The veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and verifying stressor events.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for tinnitus, depression, and PTSD due to a lack of competent medical evidence associating these conditions with his military service. The Board found that the veteran did not engage in combat with an enemy, which means his stressors must be corroborated by other sources.
The Board has determined that there is no evidence linking the veteran's current psychiatric and spine disorders to his military service, and thus denied both claims.
The Board has determined that the appellant's hypertension, hiatal hernia with reflux, and major depression are all service-connected. The effective date for these determinations is not specified in the decision.
The Board has determined that further development is required for the veteran's claims, including additional examinations and obtaining relevant medical records. The case will be remanded to the RO for these actions.
The Board has determined that the veteran's restrictive airways disease is not related to his service, and therefore denied this claim. The veteran was granted a 70 percent rating for his acquired psychiatric disorder (Anxiety, Major Depression, PTSD).,The veteran's mental health condition includes anxiety, major depression, and PTSD, with symptoms such as irritability, impaired impulse control resulting in threatened violence, hypervigilance, panic attacks, and nightmares.
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for PTSD, Anxiety Disorder, and Depressive Disorder due to a lack of evidence supporting these conditions were incurred or aggravated by military service.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development to determine if the veteran's current psychiatric conditions are related to her service, including any pre-existing mental health issues.
The Board has determined that the veteran's major depressive disorder and right shoulder disability are proximately due to or the result of her service-connected left knee disability, and thus grants these claims.
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including clarifying whether the veteran wants a hearing before a Veterans Law Judge and scheduling such a hearing if requested.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.