Diabetes decisions — 2004
804 indexed Board decisions in 2004.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type 1 as a result of exposure to herbicides and neuropathy of the feet and spine and degenerative arthritis of the entire spine.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2004
The Board has determined that the veteran's diabetes mellitus, which is presumed to be service-connected due to herbicide exposure in Vietnam, contributed substantially or materially to his death from pancreatic cancer. The Board granted service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The veteran's claims for disability benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for diabetes mellitus, hiatal hernia, and dysphagia resulting from VA surgical treatment on April 10, 1975 were denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to lack of verification of exposure to Agent Orange in Thailand.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board found no evidence linking the veteran's service-connected PTSD to his cause of death, asphyxia due to freshwater drowning. The Board denied service connection for the cause of death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical opinions regarding the veteran's service-connected disabilities and their impact on his employability.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes, gum disease as residuals of in-service exposure to ionizing radiation, and arthritis of the lumbar spine as residuals of in-service exposure to ionizing radiation. The claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for sexual dysfunction due to VA surgery performed in August 1987 was also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for post-traumatic stress disorder and an eye condition as secondary to diabetes due to a lack of current medical diagnosis and no causal nexus between the conditions and service-connected diabetes.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · April 2004
The Board has determined that the effective date for the grant of service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II, associated with herbicide exposure is May 2, 2001.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2004
The Board has granted service connection for a hiatal hernia and remanded the issue of service connection for diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The veteran's initial evaluation for diabetes mellitus was denied as it did not meet the criteria for a higher rating. The claim for service connection of a kidney condition was also denied, with no indication that the condition is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board found that the veteran's current diabetes mellitus disability was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service, and thus denied his claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection of organic heart disability, hypertensive vascular disease, and diabetes mellitus. The decision found no new and material evidence to reopen the claim for an organic heart disability, and concluded that both hypertension and diabetes mellitus were not incurred in or aggravated by military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · April 2004
The veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board has remanded the case for further development to determine if a higher rating is warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · April 2004
The veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of diabetes associated with herbicide exposure was denied as the law does not allow for such a grant based on the evidence presented.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2004
The Board denied the veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension, finding no evidence of a nexus to his military service or exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for arthritis, a skin disorder (claimed as secondary to Agent Orange exposure), and PTSD due to new evidence submitted by the appellant. The diabetes mellitus issue remains under review.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for further development, including obtaining a unit history and scheduling VA examinations. The issues of service connection for PTSD and an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus are pending.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The veteran seeks service connection for diabetes mellitus and related conditions, claiming exposure to herbicides during his temporary duty assignment in Vietnam. The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information regarding the alleged TAD in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2004
The veteran is seeking service connection for diabetes mellitus, which he claims was caused by his exposure to Agent Orange during military service. The Board has ordered the RO to obtain all relevant records and information from VA and the Armed Services Center for Research of Unit Records (USASCRUR) to determine if the veteran was exposed to herbicides or other toxins while stationed at an Air Force Base in Guam.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.