Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
804 vetted Board decisions in 2004.
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete information and evidence, including lack of service personnel records and verification of Agent Orange exposure. The veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus will be reconsidered after these issues are addressed.
The veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II is being remanded due to the need for further medical examination and evaluation.
The Board denied service connection for schizophrenia and diabetes mellitus, finding that these conditions were not incurred or aggravated by active military service.
The Board has granted an effective date of January 27, 2000 for the award of service connection for PTSD. The veteran's claim for TDIU benefits remains pending.
The veteran's claims for PTSD and an initial evaluation for diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction were denied. The effective date for the grant of service connection for diabetes mellitus was also not granted.
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the veteran's death, and thus has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this claim.
The service-connected disabilities contributed substantially to the veteran's death, and by extending the benefit of doubt, the Board has granted service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The VA denied the veteran's claim for an initial disability rating greater than 20 percent for diabetes mellitus, as his condition is not insulin-dependent and controlled with oral medication and a restricted diet.
The Board has ordered further development in the veteran's claims for service connection for various symptoms, including diabetes mellitus and undiagnosed illnesses. The case is now remanded to the RO for additional development.
The Board found that the veteran's nicotine dependence, which was related to his service-connected eye disorder, caused his death due to emphysema and other conditions. The Board granted service connection for the cause of the veteran's death.
The Board found that the veteran's low back, neck, diabetes mellitus Type II, and hepatitis C disabilities were not incurred or aggravated by his active duty service.
The Board granted service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus effective from April 5, 2001. The veteran's claim was received within one year of the effective date of a liberalizing regulation that added Type II diabetes mellitus to the list of presumptive diseases associated with exposure to herbicides.
The Board found that the veteran's coronary artery disease is not significantly related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus and was more likely due to other significant risk factors.
The Board has granted service connection for liver disease, erectile dysfunction, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus associated with Type II diabetes mellitus. The evaluations are all rated at 20 percent from August 6, 2001.
The Board denied the veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for service connection of diabetes mellitus and hypertension, finding no evidence of a prior informal or formal claim before September 10, 1998.
The Board has granted an initial disability rating of 60 percent for the veteran's diabetes mellitus, effective April 23, 2001.
The May 2002 decision corrected an administrative error in the service-connected combined disability rating, adjusting it from 30 percent to 20 percent effective August 1, 2002.
The veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection and evaluations have been denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus or a higher evaluation for PTSD.
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to a significant change in VA law and incomplete notification requirements.
The veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II is denied. The RO will obtain and associate with the claims file any outstanding private medical records from his treating physician to determine if there has been a worsening of his hypertension and hand condition.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.