Diabetes decisions — 2009
1,779 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found no medical evidence linking the Veteran's eye disorders to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and a respiratory disability due to asbestos exposure as there was no credible evidence linking these conditions to service or any in-service exposures.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated during service and is not proximately due to, the result of, or chronically aggravated by a service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred or aggravated by service, and the Board denied his claim as there is no evidence of exposure to Agent Orange during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy, finding new and material evidence. However, it was not able to establish a link between these conditions and his military service or exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for PTSD is dismissed as the original decision became final.,The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for Type II Diabetes Mellitus is denied because the earliest date of receipt of a formal or informal claim was May 31, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus existed prior to his active service and was not aggravated by such service. Therefore, it denied the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus is granted on a presumptive basis due to presumed exposure to Agent Orange during his service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus was denied, as his condition is currently controlled with oral medication and does not require insulin. The claim for service connection for tinnitus was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's toenail fungus associated with diabetes mellitus type II has been evaluated as noncompensable throughout the appeal period.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected type II diabetes mellitus requires a 20 percent disability rating, as it necessitates insulin use and dietary restrictions but not activity limitations.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2009
The Veteran withdrew his appeals, resulting in the dismissal of all pending issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Veteran's claim for automobile and adaptive equipment or adaptive equipment is being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and medical opinions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development of her claims, including obtaining VA outpatient treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for sleep apnea, finding that it was not caused or aggravated by his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2009
The Board is remanding the case for further development and consideration, including obtaining an opinion regarding the cause of the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for a TDIU was denied as there is no evidence of record showing he met the schedular requirements for a TDIU prior to January 7, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2009
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and hepatitis C were denied as there is no evidence of these conditions during his period of honorable service, or within one year after discharge. The Board found that the preponderance of the evidence was against a finding that the Veteran's current diagnoses are related to service.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2009
The Veteran's appeal was granted for service connection of PTSD. The remaining claims were dismissed due to the Veteran withdrawing his appeals.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.