Diabetes decisions — 2009
1,779 indexed Board decisions in 2009.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, which he claims was caused by exposure to herbicides during his military service, is being remanded due to the need for additional development and evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, finding that the Veteran's current condition is related to his military service. Service connection was denied for sleep apnea due to lack of a medical nexus between the condition and either the Veteran's military service or any service-connected disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claim for increased ratings and service connection were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a compensable rating for erectile dysfunction.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for myelodysplastic syndrome and diabetes mellitus, finding no evidence of a nexus to his military service or exposure to herbicide agents. The claim for diabetes mellitus was also denied as new and material evidence had not been received.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's claims for diabetes mellitus, right eye disability, gastrointestinal condition, hearing loss, and tinnitus are being remanded due to the need for additional development.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension/vascular disease and a urological disorder, finding that there was no evidence of these conditions during his military service or within the one-year presumptive period following discharge. The Board also found insufficient medical evidence linking any current hypertension to his diabetes.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent, and his PTSD is rated as 70 percent effective from March 15, 2004 to September 26, 2005. The Veteran also has separate ratings for carpal tunnel syndrome of the right hand (10%) and left hand (20%).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran's claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities is being remanded for further action, including determining whether his diabetes mellitus should continue to be rated as a service-connected disability and adjudicating a claim for type I diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's Type II Diabetes Mellitus was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service and may not be presumed to have been incurred in service, including as a result of exposure to Agent Orange. The Board found no evidence linking the diabetes to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Board has determined that further action is needed to determine the current severity of the Veteran's service-connected disabilities and whether he has a current diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. The claims are being remanded for additional examinations and development.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in the May 1971 rating decision that denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, concluding that the RO did not make a factual error but rather evaluated conflicting medical reports.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for higher evaluations of peripheral neuropathy and erectile dysfunction have been granted, but the maximum benefits were not awarded.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and heart problems, both secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's service connection claims for a heart condition, acquired mental disorders, bilateral hearing loss, hypertension, and diabetes have been denied. The Board found that the Veteran did not meet the criteria for presumptive service connection for his bilateral hearing loss due to lack of evidence showing such disability within one year after discharge from service. Service connection was also denied for hypertension as new and material evidence had not been received sufficient to reopen the claim, and diabetes was not related to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Veteran's claims for diabetes mellitus type II, parathyroid irregularities, and colon polyps have been denied as there is no evidence linking these conditions to service or in-service exposure to herbicides.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have a current eye disorder or kidney disability that is proximately due to, caused by, or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The currently demonstrated heart disability is found to be at least as likely as not due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected psychiatric disability did not cause or contribute to his death, and thus denied the claim for DIC benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have service connection for any of the claimed conditions, as there is no evidence to support a nexus between his current disabilities and his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2009
The Board denied service connection for hypertension, coronary artery disease (CAD), peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), diabetic retinopathy, a kidney condition, and diabetic ulcers, all conditions to include as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2009
The Veteran seeks a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities. The Board has determined that additional development is needed, including obtaining Social Security Administration records and arranging for an examination.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.