Diabetes decisions — 2010
1,671 indexed Board decisions in 2010.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II was denied as the evidence did not show that his disability warranted a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the previously denied claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2, claimed as due to Agent Orange exposure. As a result of this reopening, presumptive service connection is granted based on presumed exposure in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus Type II is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board finds no basis to grant a higher rating.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II as secondary to herbicide exposure was denied because there is no evidence of in-service disease or injury and the Veteran did not serve in Vietnam. The Board found that he was not exposed to Agent Orange during his military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board finds that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred in service and is not related to service or to an incident of service origin.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's son, G.B., was not permanently incapable of self-support at age 18 due to his medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus and hypertension. The evidence did not establish permanent incapacity prior to reaching the age of 18.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's death was caused by an acute stroke, but there is no evidence linking any of the underlying conditions (diabetes, hypertension, and major depression) to his military service. The Board found that service connection for the cause of death is not warranted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not prevent him from securing or following a substantially gainful occupation, and thus denied his claim for a TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Veteran meets the criteria for special monthly pension based on a need for aid and attendance due to his service-connected disabilities, including heart disease with coronary artery disease and moderate to severe heart failure. He also qualifies for housebound benefits as he is over 65 years old and has multiple service-connected conditions that independently rate at or above 60 percent.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus type II and erectile dysfunction, finding that the evidence did not warrant a higher rating under any applicable diagnostic codes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, hypertension, renal disability, and upper and lower extremity disabilities were not incurred or aggravated by service. The claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus with diabetic nephropathy is currently rated at 20 percent, and the Board found that it does not warrant a higher rating based on current symptomatology.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus requires an oral hypoglycemic agent and a restricted diet, but not regulation of activities. The criteria for a higher disability rating are not met.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a genitourinary disorder is denied as there is no competent evidence of a current diagnosis. The claims for increased evaluations for diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy are remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection for coronary artery disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, Type II have been denied as the evidence does not support a finding that these conditions are related to his service-connected PTSD.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has determined that the issue of service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death is inextricably intertwined with the issue of service connection for chronic diabetes mellitus for accrued benefits purposes. The case is therefore being remanded to address both issues.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent, his peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities are each rated at 40 percent, his erectile dysfunction is rated as noncompensable, and his nuclear cataracts and diabetic retinopathy are each rated as noncompensable. The Veteran's service-connected conditions have been granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2010
The Board has ordered additional development to address whether the Veteran's service-connected diabetes contributed to his cause of death and acute renal failure.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied. The Board found that the claimed conditions did not manifest during active service or within one year of service, and are not shown to have developed as a result of an established event, injury, or disease during active service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2010
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.