Diabetes decisions — 2014
2,107 indexed Board decisions in 2014.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2014
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, left knee disability, and leukocytosis due to lack of evidence of herbicide exposure during his military service. The Veteran did not serve in Vietnam or near the Korean DMZ, nor was he exposed to Agent Orange as alleged.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2014
The Veteran's appeal involves claims for increased ratings and a TDIU rating related to his service-connected PTSD, diabetes mellitus, tinnitus, and left ear hearing loss. The case is being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and development of records.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and hypertension are denied as there is no evidence of herbicide exposure during service, and the conditions did not manifest within one year post-service. The Board finds that the Veteran's current diagnoses do not meet the criteria for direct service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2014
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims to reopen his service connection claims for diabetes mellitus and depression, as well as PTSD. The new evidence submitted does not raise a reasonable possibility of substantiating these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and hypertension due to exposure to herbicides. Both conditions are presumed to be related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2014
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded due to the referral of other claims and the need for a VA examination. The appeal will be reconsidered after these matters are resolved.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II and ischemic heart disease are associated with exposure to Agent Orange during service. As such, these conditions meet the criteria for presumptive service connection under VA regulations.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2014
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus requires a restricted diet and treatment with insulin and hypoglycemic agents, warranting his current 20 percent rating. However, the Veteran does not require regulation of activities as part of medical management of his diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2014
The Board has determined that service connection is not warranted for any of the conditions listed, as there was no in-service injury or event related to these conditions and the Veteran does not have confirmed exposure to Agent Orange or other tactical herbicide agents within the meaning of 38 C.F.R. § 3.307.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2014
The Veteran's death was not due to a service-connected disability, and the appellant did not apply for Service-Disabled Veterans Insurance within two years of receiving notification of his service connection. The evidence does not support a finding that the Veteran was mentally incompetent at any time relevant to this claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Board has reopened the Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and granted it on a presumptive basis due to exposure to herbicides during service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Veteran is found to be in need of regular aid and attendance due to his multiple disabilities, which require assistance with activities of daily living and protection from environmental hazards.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's sleep apnea is causally related to his service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, diabetes, hypertension, and sinusitis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2014
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a recent decision by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC) in Tagupa v. McDonald, requiring verification of service from the United States Department of the Army.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2014
The Board has directed the VA to obtain medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus and PTSD caused or contributed to his death. The case is now remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Board finds that the Veteran's hypertension is at least as likely as not related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and thus grants service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2014
The Veteran has withdrawn his appeal for service connection of diabetes mellitus, type II. The Board does not have jurisdiction to consider this matter.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2014
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded for further examination and medical opinion to address the functional effects of his service-connected disabilities on his employability.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2014
The Veteran's claims of service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus, diabetic retinopathy, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities have been reopened.,Secondary service connection is granted as these conditions are complications of his now service-connected type 2 diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus and malignant melanoma, both linked to herbicide exposure in Vietnam, are being remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.