Diabetes decisions — 2015
2,061 indexed Board decisions in 2015.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling the Veteran for VA examinations to evaluate his service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran is seeking service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, which he claims is related to herbicide exposure during his tours in Guam. The Board has ordered additional development to verify the Veteran's claimed exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the current level of disability associated with his diabetes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The case is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining treatment records and Social Security Administration (SSA) records. The Veteran will also be provided with a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy, as well as an opinion regarding his ability to work due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for Type II Diabetes Mellitus, finding that there was no evidence of exposure to herbicides during his service and thus no basis for presumptive service connection. The Court vacated this decision and remanded it back to the Board.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy, associated with his diabetes mellitus, does not meet the criteria for a compensable disability rating under VA's rating criteria.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including diabetes mellitus, combine to render him unable to obtain or retain substantially gainful employment since April 6, 2015. His diabetes requires regulation of dietary activities but not restriction of physical activities.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for service connection of various diabetic neuropathies and other conditions, finding that the evidence did not support a grant based on direct exposure to herbicides or presumptive service connection due to his Korean service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to new evidence submitted by the Veteran and his representative. The issues of rating PTSD and entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability are being reviewed.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals as he withdrew them prior to a decision being made. The Board also determined that service connection for erectile dysfunction is not warranted, as it is not caused or aggravated by his service-connected atrophic left testicle.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2015
The Board is remanding the case to obtain VA treatment records from 1971 and 1975 for diabetes mellitus, as these records are not currently in the claims file.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2015
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn due to the grant of a 100% disability rating for PTSD effective from December 12, 2013. As such, no further action is required on any remaining issues.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and his claim for TDIU is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus is not etiologically related to service and is not proximately due to or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD. Therefore, service connection for diabetes mellitus is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found that diabetes mellitus was not incurred in service and is not related to medications taken for hypertension and asthma. Metabolic syndrome, while diagnosed post-service, has no evidence of being present or treated during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for further development due to the need for additional VA clinical records and SSA records.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran is seeking service connection for hypertension and diabetes mellitus, which are currently diagnosed conditions. The Board has determined that a VA examination is needed to determine the likely etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board found no evidence of a heart disorder during service or within the one-year presumptive period following discharge from service. The Veteran's current heart disorder is not considered related to active service, including contaminated water exposure at Camp Lejeune.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for left knee disability, back disability, right hip disability, diabetes mellitus, and erectile dysfunction. The evidence did not establish a direct link between these conditions and military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain more recent records and provide him with a VA examination to determine the nature of his claimed conditions, including diabetic retinopathy, low back condition, acquired psychiatric condition (PTSD and depression), and hypertension.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.