Diabetes decisions — 2017
2,291 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's current diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus is not related to his active service, including exposure to herbicide agents. The evidence did not establish a link between his claimed temporary duty at Eglin AFB and exposure to herbicide agents.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including verification of his periods of active duty and VA examination regarding his low back disability.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran did not serve on a ship that was subject to the presumption of herbicide exposure, and therefore cannot establish service connection for his claimed conditions based on this presumption.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2017
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including diabetes mellitus type II and peripheral neuropathy of multiple extremities and knees. The decision found that there was no evidence of herbicide exposure during service and concluded that these conditions were not incurred or aggravated by service.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · December 2017
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus is presumed to have been incurred during his active service in Thailand due to herbicide exposure, and he has a current disability. The Board finds the Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his deployment to Thailand from July 1970 to July 1971.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2017
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for chemical burn residuals, coronary artery disease, and hypertension as new and material evidence was not received. The low back disability, neck disability, arthritis of the legs, right hand arthritis, elbow disability, high cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, bilateral hearing loss, left ear sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, stomach problems, and sinus problems were denied due to lack of in-service event, injury, or disease.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2017
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for DM, HTN, neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities, and a liver condition, all presumed to be related to exposure to herbicide agents. The evidence did not show any in-service disease or injury that could be linked to these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2017
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining a VA examination and considering the Veteran's claims in light of his claimed sarcoidosis.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2017
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn prior to the Board making a decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2017
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and liver disability as there was no evidence of a current disability or in-service injury, disease, or exposure to Agent Orange.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2017
The Board has granted service connection for a kidney disorder to include nephritis and hypertension, both found to be secondary to the Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus.,Affording the Veteran the benefit of the doubt, his kidney disorder and hypertension are etiologically related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II and bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy were granted effective November 5, 2008.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Board found that the Veteran did not have exposure to herbicides during service and thus could not establish presumptive service connection for his conditions. The evidence was not in equipoise on whether any current diagnoses were related to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded due to the addition of new evidence, including VA treatment records. Additional development is required, including a VA examination to assess the etiology of his diabetes mellitus, type II, hypertension, and right and left foot disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2017
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection have been denied. His diabetes mellitus type II is rated at the maximum allowable under VA regulations, his tinnitus remains at a noncompensable rating, and he does not meet the criteria for compensable evaluations of bilateral SNHL or any other conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Veteran's death was caused by his service-connected pancreatic cancer with metastatic disease to the liver and gallbladder, which is presumed to be related to his exposure to Agent Orange during service. The claim for DIC under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 is dismissed as the Appellant withdrew it.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2017
The Veteran is entitled to a TDIU due to the combined effects of his service-connected disabilities, including ischemic heart disease, prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus type II, cold injury, irritable bowel syndrome, and hemorrhoids. The effective date for this decision is February 11, 2016.
- Whole decision: DeniedPACT Act · November 2017
The Veteran's claim for an effective date prior to February 11, 2011, for the grant of service connection for diabetes mellitus type II is denied. The Board found that the criteria for an earlier effective date were not met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development and examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2017
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn prior to the Board making a decision.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.