Diabetes decisions — 2017
2,291 indexed Board decisions in 2017.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Board found no evidence of a chronic low back disability in service or within one year after discharge, and the preponderance of the evidence is against a finding that such disability is related to service.,VA examiners opined that type 2 diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy are not caused by psychiatric disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2017
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination. The Veteran's claim for an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus is on appeal.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2017
The Veteran's hypertensive cardiovascular disease with renal impairment and pacemaker is rated at 100 percent from March 11, 2010. The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 70 percent since February 14, 2008. The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type 2 requires a compensable rating. There are no compensable ratings for impotence, urticaria, or headaches.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection for malaria residuals, diabetes mellitus type 2, and a heart disorder have been reopened. The evidence submitted is new and material to reopen these claims.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2 has also been reopened with the submission of additional medical evidence linking his current condition to his active service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2017
The Veteran is granted a 60 percent rating for diabetic nephropathy and diabetes mellitus, type II prior to April 29, 2015. The claim for TDIU prior to October 11, 2013 is also granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, the maximum schedular rating available. The evidence does not support a higher evaluation as his condition requires only oral medications and a restricted diet.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2017
The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for diabetes mellitus was dismissed as a freestanding claim is not allowed.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2017
The Veteran is granted service connection for diabetes mellitus due to Agent Orange exposure and degenerative arthritis in the left knee. Service connection for bilateral hip disorder is denied as there is no current diagnosis.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's type 2 diabetes mellitus and asthma are not related to service, including exposure to Agent Orange or other hazardous materials. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2017
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to inadequate VA examinations and the need for additional medical records.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied as there is no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides and the condition did not manifest within one year after separation from active duty. Service connection for peripheral neuropathy, heart disability, and migraine headaches were also denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2017
The Veteran's claims for hypertension and TDIU have been deferred due to the grant of combined 100% disability rating, but his diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction remains on appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2017
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to fully and correctly decide the Veteran's claims for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction, service connection for hypertension secondary to diabetes mellitus, and remanded the case for further development.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2017
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant, and thus the case is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2017
The Veteran is seeking service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, a heart condition, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, type II. The case is REMANDED to obtain additional medical records and determine the appropriate disposition of his claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2017
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including a new VA examination to determine his eligibility for specially adapted housing or a special home adaptation grant and service connection for voiding dysfunction.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and a low back disorder. The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for acute bronchitis was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2017
The Board has determined that the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is at least as likely as not caused by his presumed herbicide agent exposure and secondary to his service-connected diabetes, peripheral neuropathy, and ischemic heart disease. As a result, the claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes and hypertension did not manifest within one year of separation from service or are otherwise related to service. The residuals of a left little finger injury were rated as limited motion, but no compensable rating was granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2017
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for sarcoidosis, diabetes mellitus, and CAD due to herbicide exposure. The Veteran is not entitled to service connection for any of these conditions.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.