Diabetes decisions — 2018
4,458 indexed Board decisions in 2018.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 40 percent from July 23, 2014. The Veteran's PTSD symptoms have worsened since his last VA examination and a new evaluation is needed to determine the appropriate rating for PTSD. TDIU is also remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with the PTSD issue.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2018
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a skin disorder, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), headaches, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities have been denied. The Board found that new evidence did not reopen the claim for a skin disorder, and that there was no nexus between any of these conditions and service or a service-connected disability.,The Veteran's diabetes mellitus has not required regulation of activities due to its severity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including verification of service dates and obtaining treatment records. The claims will be readjudicated after the additional development.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2018
The claims for migraine headaches, head injury, and diabetes mellitus were denied. The claim of PTSD was recharacterized as an acquired psychiatric disability but remains denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Board has decided to remand the case for a VA examination to determine if the appellant requires aid and attendance due to her health conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2018
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2, to include as due to herbicide agent exposure, is denied. The Board found no evidence of herbicide agent exposure during service and no in-service occurrence related to diabetes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Board has remanded the claims for increased ratings and TDIU due to additional VA medical records being added to the file.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Board has determined that additional evidence is needed to fully and fairly consider the merits of the Veteran's claims, including Social Security Administration records and VA treatment records. The Veteran should also be scheduled for examinations to assess the current severity of his service-connected PTSD with TBI, traumatic arthritis, right ankle disability with scar, and other disabilities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded due to the inclusion of new VA examination reports that were not considered in the initial decision. The AOJ needs to review these additional documents and consider their impact on the disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a VA examination to assess the impact of his service-connected disabilities on his ability to secure and follow substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · May 2018
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the cause of death and service connection for any disabilities that may have contributed to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2018
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral upper extremity and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy as secondary to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II is granted. His claims for increased ratings of varicose veins and knee disabilities are denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Veteran's left shoulder arthritis is currently rated at 10 percent, but the evidence does not support a higher rating. The Veteran’s service-connected diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent and there are no compensable complications.,Diabetes mellitus requires more than one daily injection of insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities (avoidance of strenuous occupational and recreational activities) with episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring at least three hospitalizations per year or weekly visits to a diabetic care provider.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2018
The Veteran's portal hypertension is granted as secondary to his service-connected hepatitis C.,Service connection for essential hypertension is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected type II diabetes mellitus is being remanded due to the need for additional medical records and an examination.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2018
The Veteran's claims for diabetes mellitus, type II and Parkinson’s disease were withdrawn by the Veteran.,The Veteran's claims for bilateral hearing loss, tinnitus, hypertension, and residuals of a stroke have been dismissed as there is no evidence to support service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · May 2018
The Veteran's claim of service connection for right hand tremors, diabetes mellitus type II, peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities, and erectile dysfunction is granted. Service connection for peripheral vision problems is denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2018
The Board has granted service connection for sleep apnea as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected type II diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2018
The Board denied service connection for a left eye disability and diabetes mellitus, finding that the Veteran does not have these conditions as a result of his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2018
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings and TDIU due to insufficient evidence from previous examinations, including a lack of METs data for his heart condition. Additional VA examinations are needed to assess current disability levels.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.