Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the claims of service connection for a lumbar spine disability, cervical spine disability, diabetes mellitus, and sleep apnea due to outstanding VA treatment records and the need for new examinations.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's appeals for increased ratings in excess of 20 percent for diabetic neuropathy, diabetes mellitus with diabetic retinopathy, and erectile dysfunction have been dismissed due to the death of the Veteran.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Board dismissed all appeals because the Veteran's representative requested that all pending appeals be withdrawn prior to a decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection of hypertension, increased ratings for diabetic nephropathy and diabetes mellitus, type II, and effective dates for TDIU and Dependents Education Assistance are denied. The Veteran's PTSD is not found to meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, is granted a 40 percent rating effective April 10, 2008.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the left foot is granted a 60 percent rating from April 10, 2008.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Veteran's claim for financial assistance for specially adapted housing is remanded due to the need for a VA examination to assess his service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to independently ambulate.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Board has dismissed all pending claims due to the death of both the Veteran and his surviving spouse.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes was reopened and granted. His MDD rating was increased to 70 percent, effective October 26, 2012.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus type II is presumed to be related to his service in Thailand, where he was exposed to Agent Orange. The claim for service connection is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for diabetes, lumbar spine strain, sciatic neuropathy of both lower extremities, femoral neuropathies, and right shoulder DJD. The issues have been referred to include a new examination to determine whether the Veteran currently suffers from diabetes.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · January 2020
The Board has granted service connection for coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus, type II due to herbicide exposure during active duty in South Korea.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is presumed to be due to herbicide exposure while serving aboard the USS Piedmont in Vietnam waters, and service connection for this condition is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss and an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes. The Veteran's current bilateral hearing loss was not related to his military service, as there is no evidence of hearing loss within the first post-service year or a nexus between the disability and service. For diabetes, the Board found that the Veteran did not require regulation of activities as part of his medical management, thus precluding a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2 was denied due to lack of in-service records and exposure. New evidence submitted suggests the Veteran may have been within the 12 nautical mile zone of the Republic of Vietnam, which could grant presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus and colon cancer due to potential exposure to herbicide agents during his active naval service. The claim for type II diabetes mellitus is being remanded because the personnel records are incomplete, while the claim for colon cancer requires further examination if exposure to herbicide agents is established.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The appeal for service connection for the listed conditions is dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been reopened and are being remanded due to the receipt of new evidence.,The Veteran is also being scheduled for various VA examinations related to his disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's service-connected bilateral eye disability causes 'permanent impairment of vision of both eyes,' warranting financial assistance for adaptive equipment in his vehicle.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claim for service connection for chronic sinusitis was denied due to lack of new and material evidence. The claims for diabetes mellitus, type II; bipartite patella and degenerative joint disease of the right knee; bipartite patella and degenerative joint disease of the left knee; right knee instability; left knee instability from October 31, 2014; and symptomatic removal of right knee semilunar cartilage were all granted with a 10 percent disability rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · January 2020
The Board has remanded the claims for diabetes mellitus, type II; coronary artery disease (CAD); peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities; thoracolumbar spine condition (back condition); and right knee degenerative joint disease (right knee condition) due to exposure to herbicide agents during service. The Veteran's military service in Vietnam is potentially relevant for these claims.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.