Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for verification of the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents while serving aboard the U.S.S. Okinawa (LPH-3) in the territorial seas within 12 nautical miles of Vietnam.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus and ischemic heart disease, finding that the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents during his service in Thailand is sufficient to establish presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unemployable, and therefore his claim for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability was denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's claims, including service connection for various psychiatric conditions, diabetes, a right knee condition, and prostate cancer. The remand requires further development of evidence regarding the Veteran’s claimed stressors for PTSD, verification of his in-service exposure to carbon tetrachloride/toxic chemicals for prostate cancer, and an addendum opinion from the March 2019 VA examiner.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to secure and follow substantially gainful employment, warranting a TDIU.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's hypertension and diabetes mellitus were related to his active service, specifically given that he was not exposed to Agent Orange in Okinawa.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him unable to obtain or maintain employment that could be considered substantially gainful, and the Board has granted his claim for a TDIU.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2020
The Board dismissed all petitions to reopen the previously denied claims for service connection due to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and opinions. The TDIU claim is also being remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type 2, was granted effective June 4, 2013.,PTSD and hypertension claims were denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the cases due to potential herbicide exposure in Vietnam, and will need to determine if the Veteran's diabetes and hypertension are related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for bilateral pes planus and new and material evidence for diabetes mellitus.,For the issue of initial rating for residuals of a fracture of the third toe of the left foot, the Veteran's claim is denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, a heart disorder, and cellulitis of the lower extremities were denied. The claim for diabetes mellitus was reopened due to new evidence showing potential exposure to herbicide agents in Okinawa, Japan, but the Board found insufficient evidence to confirm such exposure. Service connection was not granted as there is no established link between service and these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus, type II was denied as the disability does not require regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding his exposure to herbicide agents during service. The VA is required to obtain any relevant treatment records and attempt to verify the Veteran’s claimed in-service exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for diabetes mellitus, heart disability, and skin cancer due to in-service herbicide exposure. The VA will conduct further development regarding the Veteran’s service within the territorial sea of Vietnam while aboard the USS Hooper, as well as address his heart disability claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the case for compliance with prior directives regarding an increased evaluation for diabetes mellitus type II.,The issue of entitlement to an initial evaluation higher than 30 percent for service-connected coronary artery disease (CAD) is also addressed and remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2020
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, other specified trauma and stressor related disorder, hypertension, polyneuropathy, and erectile dysfunction due to in-service herbicide exposure. The conditions are presumed as the Veteran served in Thailand during a period that qualifies as Vietnam era service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2020
The Board has remanded the cases for a VA examination to determine if the Veteran's coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus type 2 are related to his military service, specifically herbicide exposure at Korat Royal Thai Air Force Base.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2020
The Veteran's claims for service connection for various disabilities, including back disability, right leg sciatica, left leg sciatica, hip disabilities, ankle and foot disabilities, respiratory issues, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, erectile dysfunction, and peripheral neuropathy have been denied as the evidence does not establish a link between these conditions and service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.