Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2019
The Veteran's sleep apnea, coronary artery disease, thyroid condition, diabetes mellitus, and ventricular arrhythmias were not shown as chronic in service or within a presumptive period. The Board found no evidence linking these conditions to his military service.,The Veteran claimed that his disabilities are related to contaminated water exposure at Camp Lejeune, but he did not provide any competent medical evidence supporting this claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include depression and PTSD, as well as bilateral hearing loss. The dermatitis, sinusitis, diabetes, and hypertension claims are denied.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2019
The Board dismissed the claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2 as a result of exposure to herbicides because the appellant requested withdrawal of the appeal.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2019
The Board denied service connection for herpes zoster and diabetes mellitus type II, finding no evidence of a relationship between the conditions and the Veteran's military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Veteran's death was caused by cardiomyopathy, diabetes, and hypertension. The Board found that the Veteran had active service in the Republic of Vietnam and established a causal nexus between his active service and his death due to diabetes. Service connection for the cause of the Veteran’s death is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the claim for hypertension as secondary to diabetes mellitus or diabetic nephropathy due to incomplete development of evidence and need for a new VA opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for OSA and DMII due to insufficient medical opinions addressing lay reports of the Veteran's symptoms while on military leave.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate addendum opinion regarding whether the Veteran's service-connected hypertension aggravated his diabetes beyond its natural progression.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedNovember 2019
The Board has stayed the adjudication of claims related to herbicide agent exposure in or near the Korean Demilitarized Zone. The petition to reopen service connection for a spine condition is reopened, but the merits of the claim are remanded due to the need for a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · November 2019
The Veteran's service connection claims for coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus type II, and a bladder condition have been remanded due to the need for additional evidence and examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, soft tissue sarcoma, IHD, and prostate cancer are granted due to herbicide agent exposure.,Service connection is granted for type II diabetes mellitus. The Veteran was exposed to herbicide agents during his military service in Thailand and has a current diagnosis of the disease.,The Veteran's claims for soft tissue sarcoma, IHD, and prostate cancer are also granted as they fall under the presumptive service connection criteria due to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · November 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, kidney condition, diabetic retinopathy, thyroid cancer, esophageal cancer, and lung cancer are all granted. The claim for service connection for Charcot foot is remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the cases for additional examinations and opinions to address the Veteran's claims of service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, low back pain, and a rating in excess of 10 percent for headaches.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2019
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for the following conditions: bilateral foot disability, acquired psychiatric disorder (PTSD), back disability, bilateral hearing loss disability, diabetes mellitus, and bilateral eye disability. As a result, these issues are dismissed.
- Whole decision: DismissedNovember 2019
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for prostate cancer was dismissed. The Board remanded the claims for service connection for diabetes, kidney dysfunction, and below-the-knee left leg amputation due to in-service exposure to PCBs.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to insufficient medical opinions and lack of evidence regarding exposure to herbicides, chemicals, or radiation during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for diabetes mellitus and bilateral lower extremity peripheral neuropathy due to Agent Orange exposure, as VA failed to verify the Veteran's in-service exposure at Fort McClellan.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy, and diabetic retinopathy are all rated at 20 percent. The Veteran's diabetic neuropathy of the left and right lower extremities are also rated at 20 percent.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unemployable from April 4, 2010 to June 20, 2016. Effective date for TDIU grant is granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2019
The Veteran's service connection claims for skin cancer, residuals of right breast cancer, scar of the right breast, diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy with hypertension, and peripheral neuropathy of the upper and lower extremities were denied. The Board found that there was no evidence to support a finding that these conditions began in service or are otherwise related to service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.