Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded multiple issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, including arthritis, diabetes mellitus, degenerative disc disease, gall bladder removal, colon cancer, kidney disability, heart disability, and an acquired psychiatric disability. The cases are being referred back for further examination and consideration of new evidence.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Veteran's application to reopen his claim for a gastrointestinal disorder was denied. Service connection for diabetes mellitus and bilateral hearing loss were granted, but service connection for tinnitus was denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Board has granted service connection for right and left upper extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy, finding that the conditions are proximately due to or related to the Veteran's service-connected diabetes.
- Whole decision: GrantedNovember 2019
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities based on exposure to herbicide agents during service. The Veteran's current diagnoses are linked to his service-connected diabetes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient clarification regarding the Veteran's need to regulate or avoid strenuous activities related to his diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims due to his failure to appear for a scheduled DRO hearing. The Veteran will be given another opportunity to present his case at a rescheduled hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death due to new and material evidence. However, the case is remanded as an addendum opinion is needed regarding whether the service-connected prostatitis contributed substantially or materially to the Veteran's prostate cancer and death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has determined that the proper procedures were not followed in determining whether the Veteran is eligible for S-DVI due to his nonservice-connected conditions. The matter must be remanded to ensure compliance with all procedural requirements set forth in the M29-1, including obtaining Attending Physician's Statements (APSs) where required and ensuring that the severity of the nonservice-connected disabilities considered to be disqualifying is accurately considered.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the etiology of the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II and whether it is caused or aggravated by his service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2019
The Veteran's death was not caused by or contributed to by his service-connected conditions, and he did not meet the criteria for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1318.
- Whole decision: DeniedNovember 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's requests to reopen his claims for service connection for bilateral foot condition, bilateral hearing loss, diabetes mellitus type II (DM), left shoulder pain, major depressive disorder (MDD), and lower back pain. The Board found that new evidence did not establish a link between these conditions and his active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension is remanded due to new evidence. The claim for diabetes mellitus remains denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)November 2019
The Veteran's TDIU claim for the period prior to November 2003 is being remanded due to potential extraschedular consideration under 38 C.F.R. § 4.16(b).
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II; hypertension; and skin cancer (melanoma) are remanded due to the need for additional development regarding his Reserve service.
- Whole decision: GrantedOctober 2019
The Veteran is granted an effective date of September 19, 2017 for the award of total disability based on individual unemployability (TDIU) due to his service-connected bilateral cataracts and diabetes.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2019
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection and rating determinations related to various conditions, including hypertension, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, below-the-knee amputations, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetes mellitus type II. The decision is due to the death of the appellant.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · October 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for prostate cancer and diabetes mellitus type II due to his alleged herbicide exposure while serving in Vietnam. The decision notes that further verification is needed regarding whether the Veteran served within the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of Vietnam, as well as obtaining VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2019
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection for asthma, neck disability, left knee disability, right knee disability, diabetes mellitus, and residuals of prostate cancer as he withdrew his appeal prior to a decision being made.
- Whole decision: DismissedOctober 2019
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection were dismissed or remanded. The diabetes claim was withdrawn, OSA and hypothyroidism were granted as secondary to diabetes.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)October 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, due to exposure to herbicide agents is remanded. The AOJ needs to verify the Veteran’s reported exposure to herbicide agents while performing patrol duty as a Light Weapons Infantryman along the Korean DMZ.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.