Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied service connection for unstable angina, brady-tachy syndrome s/p pacemaker implantation, and diabetes type 2 as secondary to herbicide exposure during active service. The evidence did not support the Veteran's claims of herbicide exposure or a link between his conditions and service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, finding that the Veteran's in-service periodontitis was likely an early manifestation of his current diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unemployable prior to February 19, 2013. The Board found that the cumulative effects of his service-connected conditions did not prevent him from securing or maintaining a substantially gainful occupation.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for lung cancer, bladder cancer, and diabetes mellitus due to lack of evidence regarding exposure to Agent Orange in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not render him unable to obtain and maintain gainful employment prior to March 7, 2017.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a right knee disorder, a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss, and 38 U.S.C. § 1151 benefits for diabetes mellitus due to lack of evidence supporting these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied the Veteran's claims of service connection for various conditions, including respiratory disorder (to include asthma), left wrist disability, left hand disability, lumbar spine disability, left hip disability, right hip disability, left knee disability, and right knee disability. The Board found that there was no evidence to support these claims.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
Service connection for tinnitus is granted.,Service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II as a result of exposure to herbicides is denied.,Secondary service connection for erectile dysfunction, bilateral cataracts, and peripheral neuropathy, bilateral upper extremities due to diabetes mellitus, type II is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, diabetes mellitus, GERD, bilateral lower extremity varicose veins, and hearing loss, have rendered him unable to secure or follow substantially gainful employment prior to January 5, 2010. The Board has granted TDIU on an extraschedular basis for this period.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus does not warrant a rating in excess of 20 percent as it only requires restricted diet and one or more daily injection of insulin, which is consistent with a 20 percent disability rating under VA regulations.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for clothing allowances due to lack of evidence showing wear and tear on his clothing. The case is remanded for further review regarding the bilateral knee braces.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has decided to remand the claims for initial review by the AOJ due to additional evidence received after the September 2015 Supplemental Statement of the Case. The Veteran's heart condition and diabetes mellitus claims will be reconsidered with this new information.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's prostate cancer and type II diabetes mellitus are related to his in-service exposure to Agent Orange during service in Da Nang, Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to herbicide exposure, as well as secondary service connection for COPD with bronchitis causing coronary artery disease. The AOJ is instructed to verify the Veteran's exposure at Eglin AFB and obtain medical opinions regarding the etiology of his conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been denied, and the Board has not established any effective dates due to lack of prior formal or informal claims.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded several service connection claims, including those for diabetes mellitus Type II, erectile dysfunction, peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, and coronary artery disease. The remand requires obtaining additional medical records and verifying the ship's location during the Veteran's Vietnam service.
- Whole decision: DismissedMay 2019
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals for service connection on multiple conditions, including hemorrhoids and a left little toe callus. The claims were also dismissed due to her withdrawal of other issues.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for diabetes mellitus, left and right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy. The case is remanded to obtain additional medical records and determine if a TDIU should be granted.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's kidney dysfunction, colon cancer, coronary artery disease (CAD), liver dysfunction, and diabetes mellitus type II are not service-connected due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his time in service at Camp Lejeune.,Service connection for the Veteran’s claimed conditions is denied as there is no medical evidence showing a link between his current disabilities and exposure to contaminated water at Camp LeJeune during service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is presumed to be related to his military service, but the exact exposure during service needs further investigation as it may have occurred within Vietnam's territorial waters.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.