Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied service connection for left leg tumor with scar, heart condition, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus type II. The Veteran's claim for special monthly pension based on need for aid and attendance was also denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has granted service connection for sleep apnea as aggravated by diabetes mellitus, subject to the laws and regulations governing the award of monetary benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II and an eye condition, to include burns and scarring, finding no evidence of a nexus between the conditions and active military service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including post-traumatic stress disorder and peripheral neuropathy, have rendered him unable to work since his retirement in 2008. The Board finds the evidence at least in equipoise on whether these conditions preclude employment.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not produce total occupational impairment, and therefore he is not entitled to TDIU.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities (including PTSD, CAD, and peripheral neuropathy) made it impossible for him to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation prior to September 30, 2016.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss disability is rated as noncompensable, and the Board finds that his service-connected disabilities alone do not prevent him from securing or following any substantially gainful employment.,The Veteran’s TDIU claim was remanded for further development due to conflicting evidence regarding his employability.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · May 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection of sleep apnea, secondary to his service-connected chronic bronchitis, has been granted. However, the compensable disability rating for his service-connected chronic bronchitis remains denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection of diabetes mellitus, type II (DMII), due to in-service exposure to tactical herbicide agents, is pending and requires further review.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus and paralysis of sciatic nerve condition were denied as the evidence did not support a finding that these conditions began during service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury, event, or disease.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a lumbar spine disability has been reopened and is denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for DMII, including as due to exposure to herbicides, is remanded.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus was reopened due to new evidence showing exposure to herbicides during his service in Thailand. As a result, the claim is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded three claims: ischemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities. The claims are related as they all involve service connection for conditions associated with diabetes mellitus. Further development is needed to determine if the Veteran was exposed to herbicides during his service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of diabetes mellitus is remanded due to the need for additional VA medical records and a new examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has decided that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is not service-connected due to lack of evidence of exposure to herbicide agents. The case is being remanded for further investigation and potential clarification on the Veteran's in-service exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has granted service connection for type II diabetes mellitus as secondary to herbicide-agent exposure. The issues of ischemic stroke, peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity, and peripheral neuropathy of the right and left lower extremities are remanded due to insufficient evidence.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to exposure to Agent Orange for bronchiectasis, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and diabetes mellitus, type II. The case is being sent back to the Joint Services Records Research Center (JSRRC) to determine if the Veteran’s naval vessel was within 12 nautical miles of Vietnam during his service.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has granted the Veteran's appeals to reopen claims for service connection for acquired psychiatric disabilities, including PTSD; bilateral hearing loss; tinnitus; and diabetes mellitus. Service connection is now granted for these conditions.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for DM II, IHD, hypertension, ED, glaucoma, and sleep apnea have been denied. The Board found no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicide agents or other events that could establish presumptive service connection.,Secondary service connection was not granted as the primary conditions (DM II and IHD) were also denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and examination to determine if service connection can be established for a heart disorder and diabetes mellitus due to exposure at Fort McClellan. The Veteran's assertions of herbicide agent exposure are being verified, and he will undergo VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of medical expenses at a private facility is denied as the treatment was not authorized by VA, and the Millennium Act did not apply to prior treatments.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.