Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II as the evidence did not show exposure to herbicide agents in Thailand and there was no indication of onset or development of the condition during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for effective dates prior to February 11, 2014 for service connection of pancreatitis, DM2, PTSD with secondary ETOH, right lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity diabetic peripheral neuropathy, tinnitus, and left ear hearing loss have been denied.,The Veteran's claim for effective date prior to February 11, 2013 for service connection of CAD has also been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine if the Veteran's erectile dysfunction is caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II. The case is being remanded for an addendum medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for right ankle/foot disability, bilateral knee osteoarthritis, type II diabetes mellitus (DM), and bilateral eye disabilities due to inextricably intertwined issues with the predicate issue of entitlement to service connection for right ankle/foot disability. The TDIU claim is also deferred.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has granted service connection for type II diabetes mellitus, finding that it is at least as likely as not incurred during active duty.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's diabetes is service connected as due to exposure to herbicides, but the Board finds that there is insufficient evidence to determine if he was exposed within 12 nautical miles of Vietnam. The RO should obtain his ship logs and address this issue.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
Service connection is granted for myelodysplastic syndrome with acute myeloid leukemia and diabetes mellitus, both for accrued benefits purposes.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, finding that there is no evidence linking his current diagnosis to his active service or any service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for lung cancer, prostate cancer, and type II diabetes mellitus due to herbicide exposure. The U.S.S. Franklin D. Roosevelt was within the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of Vietnam while the Veteran served on the ship from August 1966 to December 1966.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, left eye cataract, left leg peripheral neuropathy, and right leg peripheral neuropathy as claimed due to herbicide exposure. The Veteran's unit was not stationed in the Korea DMZ, and there is no evidence of herbicide exposure during his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence and will provide a VA examination to determine if there is a current diagnosis of an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD and depression. The TDIU claim is also being remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's appeal of the issue of entitlement to service connection for pharyngitis is dismissed. The Board has remanded issues regarding low back disability, ischemic heart disease, erectile dysfunction, chest scar, and type II diabetes mellitus due to Gulf War exposure.
- Whole decision: DeniedMay 2019
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II is rated at 20 percent and not entitled to a higher rating.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the left upper extremity is rated at 20 percent and not entitled to a higher rating.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the right upper extremity is rated at 20 percent and not entitled to a higher rating.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity is rated at 20 percent and not entitled to a higher rating.,The Veteran's peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity is rated at 20 percent and not entitled to a higher rating.,The Veteran's PTSD is currently rated at 70 percent and not entitled to a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · May 2019
The Veteran's service on the USS Oriskany is unclear, and there is insufficient evidence to determine if he was exposed to herbicides. The case is being remanded for further investigation.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus type 1 was rated at 40% for the entire period on appeal, but a 60% rating is granted only for the periods from October 11, 2010 to October 10, 2011 and January 15, 2017 to January 14, 2018.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
- Whole decision: Partly grantedMay 2019
The Veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension and diabetes mellitus were denied. The claim for service connection of diabetes mellitus was reopened, but the service connection itself remains denied.
- Whole decision: GrantedMay 2019
The Board has granted service connection for type II diabetes mellitus based on presumptive exposure to herbicide agents due to the Veteran's service in the 12 nautical mile territorial sea of the Republic of Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Veteran's TDIU claim is remanded due to incomplete VA examination and the need for updated evidence regarding his current employment status and disability severity.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)May 2019
The Board has remanded the claims for erectile dysfunction, hypertension, cyst on the left side of the head, tumor on the left side of the neck, and diabetes mellitus, type II based upon substitution due to new evidence received since the last denial.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.