Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, to include as a result of herbicide exposure, was denied. The evidence did not support the Veteran's claims regarding his alleged exposure to herbicides during service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not render him unable to obtain or maintain gainful employment, and the criteria for a TDIU are therefore not met.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, with diabetic neuropathy, retinopathy, and erectile dysfunction is being remanded due to the need for additional development of his medical records and opinions regarding the onset and aggravation of his condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claims for service connection for various conditions, including bilateral hearing loss, Parkinson's disease, heart disability, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, sleep apnea, and erectile dysfunction are not fully developed. The appeal is REMANDED to allow for further development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Veteran's claims for diabetes, loss of the sense of smell, vasodepressor syncope (syncope), and erectile dysfunction (ED) are being remanded due to incomplete records and need for additional examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has determined that the evidence is at least in equipoise regarding whether the Veteran's current diabetes insipidus is due to his military service, and thus service connection for diabetes insipidus is granted.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2016
The Board has ordered further development for the issues of service connection for diabetes mellitus, PTSD, and a psychiatric disability other than PTSD. The remand includes obtaining additional VA medical records, SSA records, and clarifying opinions regarding the Veteran's claimed service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's claims for service connection were denied. The Board found that the conditions claimed are not related to his active service or any incident therein.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · January 2016
The Veteran's service connection claim for type 2 diabetes mellitus is granted as the condition is associated with herbicide exposure in Vietnam, a presumptive basis.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2016
The Veteran's claimed disabilities were not incurred or aggravated by his military service, and may not be presumed to have been so incurred or aggravated.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2016
The Board has granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, right eye ptosis, and neuropathy of the lower extremities. The remaining claims for skin disorder, circulatory disorder, and an eye disability (other than right eye ptosis) are remanded for further development.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his withdrawal of claims for an effective date prior to September 16, 2007 for service connection for migraines and a rating in excess of 50 percent for migraines. The Board found that the Veteran currently has bilateral degenerative joint disease and calcaneal spurs in his heels which are due to his service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Veteran's type 2 diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, the minimum rating required under VA regulations. The Board found that his condition does not meet or approximate the criteria for a higher rating as it does not require insulin and restricted diet with regulation of activities.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2015
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, hypertensive heart disease, erectile dysfunction, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities as these conditions are not related to military service.,The Veteran's current diagnoses were noted in a November 2010 VA examination.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's DM requires a 40 percent rating, effective August 3, 2007. The Board found that the Veteran's DM required regulation of activities and granted a 40 percent rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and verifying the location of the trim pad at the Takhli Royal Thailand Air Force Base. The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II remains pending.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's service connection claims for Type II diabetes mellitus and prostate cancer have been granted due to presumed exposure to herbicides during his military service. His PTSD claim is also granted, but at a lower initial rating of 30 percent.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedDecember 2015
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been reopened due to the submission of new and material evidence. However, his claims for diabetes mellitus, type II and obstructive sleep apnea remain denied as there is no direct or presumptive evidence linking these conditions to service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Board has remanded the case for additional development, including obtaining medical records and conducting VA examinations to assess the Veteran's service-connected disabilities and their impact on his ability to work.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2015
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to obtain additional VA treatment records and to issue a Statement of the Case on several issues.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.