Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2014
The Board has found new and material evidence to reopen the Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, and Parkinson's disease due to exposure of Agent Orange. Both conditions are presumed to have been incurred in active military service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2014
The Veteran's service aboard the U.S.S. Oklahoma City did not involve actual herbicide exposure, and his diabetes mellitus type II first manifested many years after service, thus failing to meet the criteria for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2014
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 40 percent, which requires insulin use, a restricted diet, and regulation of activities. The evidence does not meet the criteria for a higher rating as he has not experienced episodes of ketoacidosis or hypoglycemic reactions requiring hospitalization or twice monthly visits to a diabetic care provider.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2014
The Veteran's claims of service connection for hearing loss, tinnitus, type II diabetes mellitus, sleep apnea, eye condition, peripheral neuropathy of the upper extremities, and peripheral neuropathy of the lower extremities are being remanded due to incomplete development. The AOJ will obtain additional evidence related to Agent Orange exposure and ensure that a VA examination is conducted for hearing loss and tinnitus.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's tinnitus did not occur in service and is not related to his military noise exposure. The claim for diabetes mellitus type II, claimed as a result of herbicide exposure, will be remanded due to incomplete information regarding Vietnam service.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2014
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus did not have onset during service or within one year of separation, and was more likely due to post-service weight gain. The claim for service connection is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2014
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including a VA examination to assess the current severity of his service-connected diabetes mellitus type II.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2014
The Board has granted service connection for meralgia paresthetica and neuropathy of the right thigh, carpal tunnel syndrome of the left wrist, diabetes mellitus type II, and sleep apnea. The effective date is set at April 7, 2014.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for blindness and diabetes mellitus, type II are being remanded due to the need for additional development including VA examinations.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2014
The Veteran's combined service-connected disability rating is 70 percent, and his disabilities relate to a common etiology (diabetes mellitus). The Board finds that the Veteran's service-connected conditions alone do not preclude him from obtaining and maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2014
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and Social Security Administration (SSA) records. A new VA examination will be arranged to assess the severity of his diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2014
The Board has granted service connection for PTSD and diabetes mellitus type II, finding that the Veteran's reported stressors are consistent with his military service.,Both conditions have been found to be related to the Veteran's in-country service in Vietnam.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)April 2014
The Veteran's claim for a rating in excess of 20 percent for diabetes mellitus is being remanded due to the need for further examination and consideration.
- Whole decision: GrantedPACT Act · April 2014
The Veteran's claim for PTSD and diabetes mellitus, type II, including secondary to inservice exposure to herbicides is granted. The Veteran was exposed to herbicides during his service in Thailand and the Board finds that he meets the criteria for presumptive service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2014
The Veteran's service-connected PTSD and diabetes mellitus did not prevent him from engaging in substantially gainful employment prior to May 9, 2011. The Board found that the evidence did not show he was unemployable due to these conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2014
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities render him in need of aid and attendance, qualifying for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for aid and attendance. He is also entitled to a certificate of eligibility for specially adapted housing due to his permanent and total disability resulting from service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: GrantedApril 2014
The Board finds that the appellant's periods of AWOL following his combat tour in the Republic of Vietnam are justified due to compelling circumstances, and thus does not constitute a bar to VA benefits.
- Whole decision: DeniedApril 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus, right upper jaw disorder, and bilateral cataracts and glaucoma are not related to his military service. The claims for these conditions have been denied.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedApril 2014
Service connection for hepatitis B and hypertension was denied as there is no evidence of in-service incurrence or exposure. Service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied due to lack of a showing of continuity of symptoms within one year after separation from service.,Service connection for hepatitis C was granted based on its relationship to the Veteran's service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)PACT Act · April 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to allow for additional development, including verification of herbicide exposure and issuance of a statement of the case on all issues.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.