Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2014
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II is being remanded due to the need for further development regarding his alleged exposure to herbicides during his service in Thailand.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service connection claims for diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease (CAD), hypertension, diabetic retinopathy, and trigger finger repair of the right thumb are granted based on presumed exposure to herbicides during his Vietnam-era service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Veteran is entitled to an effective date of June 1, 2003 for his retroactive restoration of retired pay due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's claims for an effective date earlier than September 5, 2007 for service connection of diabetes mellitus and aid and attendance were granted. The effective dates are set at January 10, 2007.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's death was caused by respiratory failure due to COPD and CHF, with his service-connected DM II and CAD contributing substantially to his condition. However, the Veteran did not meet the criteria for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318 as he had not been continuously rated totally disabled for at least ten years prior to death.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2014
The Board dismissed the appeal due to the Veteran's death, and no jurisdiction remains for further action.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus and hypertension are denied as there is no evidence of in-service exposure to herbicides, the diseases did not manifest within one year after separation from service, and there is insufficient evidence linking these conditions to service or any other service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus, type II, required insulin and a restricted diet prior to December 28, 2011. The Board granted a 40 percent rating for this period.
- Whole decision: DismissedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's appeal for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II was withdrawn prior to the Board's decision. The remaining claims of service connection for a respiratory disorder, bilateral ankle disability, and bilateral knee disability are remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's claims for service connection for diabetes mellitus, respiratory disability (claimed as due to exposure to asbestos), and low back injury residuals were denied. The claim for higher initial rating for PTSD was not addressed in this decision.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2014
The Board denied an increased rating for diabetes mellitus and did not address the issue of service connection for vision problems, which were previously denied. The decision also dismissed the issues regarding entitlement to a compensable rating for kidney disease and whether new and material evidence has been received to reopen a previously denied claim of entitlement to service connection for vision problems.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been received to reopen the claim of service connection for diabetes mellitus type II. The Veteran's exposure to herbicides in Vietnam is presumed, and his diabetes mellitus type II is found to be related to this exposure. Service connection is granted for PTSD with a 30% evaluation.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes, to include as due to herbicide exposure, is denied. There is no evidence of herbicide exposure during service and the disease did not manifest within one year post-service.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Board has reopened the claim of service connection for a low back disability and granted a compensable rating (10%) for residuals of multiple rib fractures. The Veteran's claims for diabetes mellitus, eye disability, right total hip replacement, and heart disability are dismissed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2014
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for a VA examination to determine his employability due to service-connected disabilities, and the case will be returned to the Board after review.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2014
The Board finds that the Veteran does not have a heart disorder, diabetes mellitus, or lung disability due to disease or injury incurred in service. The presumptions for herbicide exposure and asbestos exposure do not apply as there is no evidence of actual exposure.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II, based on new evidence showing potential herbicide exposure. Service connection is granted as the Veteran's current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, type II, is presumed due to herbicide exposure.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)January 2014
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for additional development of evidence, including obtaining medical records and SSA benefits information. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered after these steps are completed.
- Whole decision: GrantedJanuary 2014
The Board has restored service connection for Type II diabetes mellitus and finds that the prior severance was improper. The Veteran's current levels of severity will be assessed through a new VA examination.
- Whole decision: DeniedJanuary 2014
The Veteran's below-the-knee amputation of the right leg was not caused by VA treatment, and there is no evidence of fault on VA's part.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.