Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to the need for further development, including obtaining additional medical records and scheduling a VA examination.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board is remanding the claims for service connection for type 2 diabetes mellitus and actinic keratoses due to incomplete information from the United States Army & Joint Services Records and Research Center (JSRRC).
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's claimed conditions are not related to his military service and thus denied his claims for service connection.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's current diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, type II, is related to presumed in-service herbicide exposure and grants service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied as there is no evidence of a disease or injury incurred in service, and the Board found that his diabetes did not manifest within one year after discharge. The claims for separate 10 percent ratings for tinnitus and an earlier effective date for hearing loss were also denied.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for DMII, finding that it was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service and may not be presumed to have been incurred during these periods of service.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied as there is no evidence of in-service exposure to Agent Orange and the disease did not manifest within one year of separation from service. The Board also found that there is insufficient medical evidence to establish a link between the current disability and service.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals regarding elevated cholesterol, high triglycerides, and fatty liver as he withdrew these issues prior to a decision being made. The Board granted service connection for hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus on a direct basis.
- Whole decision: DismissedDecember 2012
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for an initial rating in excess of 20 percent for type II, diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has remanded the case for further action due to a failure to appear at a scheduled videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes mellitus and erectile dysfunction are not shown to warrant a higher rating or service connection, respectively.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims to reopen his service connection for various knee disabilities, cervical spine fusion, and lumbosacral spine degenerative disc disease. The evidence submitted did not relate to the basis for the prior denial of these claims.
- Whole decision: GrantedDecember 2012
The Veteran's service-connected acquired psychiatric disorder is currently rated at 10 percent, and the Board has granted a higher initial disability evaluation of 30 percent effective March 16, 2009. The other issues remain unresolved.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran is seeking service connection for peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral lower extremities, which he claims is related to his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The claim will be remanded for additional development including obtaining pertinent VA treatment records.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Veteran's DM requires insulin and a restricted diet but does not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent prior to November 2, 2009.,DM meets the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 40 percent prior to October 16, 2010, as evidenced by hospitalizations and visits to a diabetic care provider.,DM does not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 60 percent beginning October 16, 2010.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development, including obtaining updated treatment records and scheduling a VA compensation examination. The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected Type II Diabetes Mellitus is being returned to the RO.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board finds that the Veteran's currently diagnosed hypertension is not connected to his military service or a service-connected disability, and therefore denies the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to technical issues with a hearing transcript and requests for additional development.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)December 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including VA examinations and medical opinions regarding his claimed bilateral knee disorder, lower back disorder, and diabetes mellitus, type 2.
- Whole decision: DeniedDecember 2012
The Board found that the Veteran's diabetes mellitus was not incurred in or aggravated by his military service and may not be presumed to have been incurred in service, including as a result of exposure to herbicides (namely, the dioxin in Agent Orange) in Thailand.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.