Diabetes Board decisions
53,738 indexed Board decisions for Diabetes.
Badges describe the whole decision, not the outcome for every condition listed. An appeal can grant one issue and deny or remand another. Check the original decision for each issue; these outcomes do not predict your claim.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development, including a VA examination to assess the current nature, extent and severity of his diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy. The RO must also consider whether separate compensable ratings are warranted for renal and eye impairment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, which is secondary to herbicide exposure and ionizing radiation, has been remanded due to the need for additional development of his Social Security Administration (SSA) records.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an increased rating for diabetes mellitus and service connection for a cyst on his left kidney. The effective date of the grant of service connection for diabetes mellitus was determined to be March 25, 2005.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent, and his peripheral neuropathy of the feet are each rated at 10 percent. The claims for higher ratings have been denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a new examination to assess the current severity of his diabetes mellitus, type II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)August 2012
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims due to the need for additional medical opinions regarding the relationship between his diabetes mellitus, type II and service as well as the relationship between his bilateral cataracts and glaucoma and his diabetes. The case will be returned to the RO for further action.
- Whole decision: Partly grantedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for hypertension, including as secondary to diabetes mellitus. The claims for ocular hypertension of the left eye, gastrointestinal disorder, sleep apnea, and fibromyalgia are all denied due to lack of a direct link to service or service-connected conditions.
- Whole decision: DismissedAugust 2012
The Veteran withdrew his appeal for the issue of entitlement to service connection for diabetes mellitus.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus, render him unable to obtain or maintain substantially gainful employment. As a result, the Veteran is granted a TDIU.
- Whole decision: DeniedAugust 2012
The Board has denied service connection for left renal cell carcinoma and right renal cyst, finding that these conditions did not manifest during active duty or are otherwise related to the Veteran's diabetes.
- Whole decision: GrantedAugust 2012
The Board has granted service connection for sleep apnea and fatigue. The issues of service connection for diabetes mellitus, hiccups and muscular twitching of the eyes, and multiple joint pain affecting the hands, wrists, fingers, knees, and ankles (including bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome) are remanded.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2012
The Board denied service connection for asbestosis, diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy, a heart condition, hypertension, and hepatitis A. The Veteran's claims were not supported by competent evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2012
The claims for service connection have been reopened, but the underlying issues remain unresolved. The Veteran's dental condition and diabetes mellitus are related to his active service, while the right eye disability and allergies do not meet the criteria for service connection.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus was denied as there is no evidence of herbicide exposure during his service, and the disease did not manifest within a year of separation from service.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2012
The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, to include as due to exposure to herbicides, is denied. The Board found no evidence of actual or presumptive exposure to herbicides and concluded that the Veteran did not have a current disability related to his service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2012
The Veteran is seeking service connection for erectile dysfunction that he believes is caused by his service-connected diabetes mellitus. The VA examiner found the Veteran had symptoms of erectile dysfunction, but noted they likely began before the onset of diabetes.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2012
The Veteran's service-connected diabetic neuropathy of the right and left feet, as well as diabetes mellitus, are currently rated at 40 percent. The Board finds that these ratings are not in accordance with the evidence presented.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2012
The Board has denied the Veteran's petitions to reopen his service connection claims for coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus type 2, and peripheral neuropathy of each extremity due to lack of new and material evidence.
- Whole decision: DeniedJuly 2012
The Board has determined that the Veteran does not have diabetes mellitus and therefore, service connection for this condition is denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)July 2012
The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding private medical records from Dr. Neal and Palmetto Health Richland Hospital, which need to be obtained for proper adjudication of the service connection claim.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.