Loading decisions…
Loading decisions…
53,738 vetted Board decisions for Diabetes.
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for service connection of several conditions, including type II diabetes mellitus and sleep apnea, to obtain medical opinions on whether these conditions are secondary to service-connected disabilities.
The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus, stating that the evidence does not show a relationship between the veteran's diabetes and their military service or service-connected disabilities.
The Board remanded the claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus type II to obtain a medical opinion on the nexus between the Veteran's toxic exposure risk and his claimed disability.
The veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, type 2, as secondary to post gastrectomy syndrome was granted. The claim for hypertension was remanded for further evaluation.
The appeal for service connection of diabetes secondary to insomnia and/or tinnitus is remanded. The Board needs a new medical opinion on whether the diabetes was caused or aggravated by these conditions.
The veteran's appeal for a higher disability rating and an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus, type II was dismissed because the veteran requested to withdraw the appeal.
The Board granted service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II; ischemic heart disease; and peripheral neuropathy in all four extremities.
The Board denied service connection for ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus type II because the evidence did not show a link to military service or herbicide exposure.
The Veteran's claims for service connection of coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus type II, and hypertension due to herbicide agent exposure are remanded. The Board will correct duty-to-assist errors before deciding the remaining claims on appeal.
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for service connection of several conditions due to inadequate VA opinions. The veteran will receive new medical examinations.
The Board remanded the claim for service connection of diabetes mellitus, type II. The Veteran's exposure to jet fuel during his military service is being considered as a potential cause.
The veteran's claim for service connection for unspecified anxiety disorder was granted. All other claims were denied.
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities require regular aid and attendance, so he is granted special monthly compensation (SMC).
The veteran's PTSD rating was increased to 70% from December 7, 2009 to April 29, 2021. The effective date for DEA eligibility was granted as of January 28, 2021. However, the request for an earlier effective date for SMC and a higher level of SMC were denied.
The veteran's appeal resulted in a mixed decision. Some ratings were granted, such as a 30 percent rating for anemia secondary to diabetes mellitus and increased ratings for diabetic neuropathy. However, other claims, including higher ratings for diabetes mellitus and earlier effective dates for service connection, were denied.
The Board has remanded the claim for service connection for diabetes due to inadequate VA medical opinion. The examiner was asked to consider and address the relationship between rheumatoid arthritis, obesity, and diabetes as well as any aggravation by service-connected disabilities.
The veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, prostate cancer, heart disability, and type II diabetes mellitus were denied. The claim for a low back disability was remanded.
The Veteran's service-connected diabetes and PTSD are found to have caused or contributed to their death. The surviving spouse is granted benefits.
The Board remanded the claims for higher ratings of diabetes and hypertension, requiring further evaluation of service connection theories beyond the PACT Act presumption.
The veteran was granted a 40% disability rating for diabetic peripheral neuropathy in both legs, but this was later reduced to 10%. The veteran was denied a higher rating for eye conditions and adaptive equipment.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.